TITLE

Did you see?

AUTHOR(S)
Stafford, Victoria
PUB. DATE
June 2013
SOURCE
Diversity & Equality in Health & Care;2013, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p129
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the issue of shared decision making (SDM) in medical interactions. It is mentioned that patients behaviour is taken into consideration to help making SDM and good medical decisions in which patients give feedback on their understanding of the knowledge provided by the medical practitioner. It states that SDM helps to improve the patient's view and also improves the doctors efficacy involving patients in the process. Also mentions that SDM enhances medical consultations.
ACCESSION #
87761818

 

Related Articles

  • An Inside Job. Benda, Bill // Integrative Medicine: A Clinician's Journal;Feb/Mar2013, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p60 

    No abstract available.

  • Resolving Patients’ Vaccination Uncertainty:GOING FROM "NO THANKS!" TO "OF COURSE!". BROWN, MARIE T.; MENA LORA, ALFREDO; ANDERSON, MARY C.; SINSKY, CHRISTINE A. // Family Practice Management;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p22 

    The article explains the challenges and measures for managing patients who refuse to undergo vaccinations. Topics addressed include the influential factors of patients seeking immunization, reasons for patients to decline vaccination, and the essence of immunizations in mitigating polio and...

  • Does patient's sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians -- a qualitative study. Loikas, Desirée; Karlsson, Linnéa; von Euler, Mia; Hallgren, Karin; Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin; Bastholm Rahmner, Pia // BMC Family Practice;10/13/2015, Vol. 16, p1 

    Background: Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women may play an important role in medical treatment. Little is known about the awareness of these differences among general practitioners (GPs) and if they consider such differences in their medical practice. The aim of this...

  • Bulletin Board. Doctor, That's None of Your Business.  // Journal of AHIMA;May2015, Vol. 86 Issue 5, p11 

    The article focuses on a new study, published in a previous issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, which found that almost half of patients prefer to withhold clinically sensitive information in their health records from some or all of their healthcare providers.

  • Commentary: Dangerous Disconnections. WEINFURT, KEVIN P. // Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;Jul2019, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p413 

    No abstract available.

  • Commentary: Treating Ambiguity in the Clinical Context: Is what you hear the doctor say what the doctor means? XAFIS, VICKI; WILKINSON, DOMINIC // Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;Jul2019, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p422 

    No abstract available.

  • Treatability Statements in Serious Illness: The Gap Between What is Said and What is Heard. BATTEN, JASON N.; WONG, BONNIE O.; HANKS, WILLIAM F.; MAGNUS, DAVID C. // Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;Jul2019, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p394 

    Empirical work has shown that patients and physicians have markedly divergent understandings of treatability statements (e.g., "This is a treatable condition," "We have treatments for your loved one") in the context of serious illness. Patients often understand treatability statements as...

  • Surgery-risks, benefits, and the value of shared decision-making. Sutherland, J.; Harris, I. // Anaesthesia & Intensive Care;May2016, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p338 

    The author reflects on making decision about surgery, with information with risks, benefits and value. The author suggests the need of high quality advice by people making decisions about surgery. The author believes that doctors may overestimate the benefits and underestimate the harms of...

  • Curative to Palliative Care-Transition and Communication Issues: Surgeons Perspective. Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana; Thejus, T. // Indian Journal of Palliative Care;May-Aug2013, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p120 

    Transition of a cancer patient from curative to palliative stage is one of the most difficult and challenging phases of cancer care both from patient and physician point of view. Most of the time the treating surgeons are expected to facilitate this transition but due to a number of reasons...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics