TITLE

Truckers liable in Colo. under no-fault

AUTHOR(S)
Attrino, Tony
PUB. DATE
July 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;07/20/98, Vol. 102 Issue 29, p17
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling allowing insurers to sue owners of privately-owned trucks under the state's no-fault insurance act. Issues on the inclusion of trucks in the non-private category of vehicles; Overview of cases of subrogation of claims appealed to the court.
ACCESSION #
877348

 

Related Articles

  • Colorado Homes Bill Seeks To Clarify Definitions In No-Fault Law; Including 'Resident Relative.'  // Insurance Advocate;01/27/2001, Vol. 112 Issue 4, p5 

    Deals with the H.B. 1034 bill designed to clarify the variations in Colorado personal injury protection (PIP) auto insurance coverages and the no-fault law. Main points of the bill according to Michael Harrold, regional manager of the National Association of Independent Insurers.

  • The N.J. auto insurance dilemma. Zarate, Vincent R. // Insurance Advocate;01/10/98, Vol. 109 Issue 2, p5 

    Focuses on the planned legislative hearings on no-fault automobile insurance in New Jersey. Assembly Speaker Jack Collins' advocacy of the no-fault coverage; Creation of a special legislative committee to review automobile insurance issues in the state; Opposition of the Trial Lawyers...

  • The Senate Buys No-Fault.  // Time;5/13/1974, Vol. 103 Issue 19, p124 

    The article provides information on issues on the national no-fault auto insurance bill co-sponsored by Frank Moss and Warren Magnuson in the U.S. It emphasizes that the bill mandates a medical reimbursement to the injured driver by his own insurance company, regardless of who caused the...

  • Legislation in California aimed at creating pure no-fault law.  // Insurance Advocate;2/10/96, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p4 

    Reports on the passage of a bill to create a pure no-fault automobile insurance system by the California Assembly. Requirement of a minimum basic personal protection coverage for medical expenses, lost income and replacement service loss; Elimination of the existing requirement of coverage for...

  • A 23 year old failed experiment. Zarate, Vincent R. // Insurance Advocate;06/22/96, Vol. 107 Issue 25, p2 

    Discusses a move to repeal the `no fault' automobile insurance law and compulsory liability insurance law in New Jersey. Opposition by lobbying groups to repeal the 1973 laws; Criticism of the increase in costs of automobile insurance premiums; Senator John Scott's stance on the issue.

  • No-Fault Reform Bill Awaiting House Passage, Short Of Mark For 'Significance': Alliance.  // Insurance Advocate;3/17/2003, Vol. 114 Issue 11, p21 

    Focuses on the pending passage of a bill aimed at reforming Colorado's no-fault automobile insurance system in the House of Representatives. Removal of certain coverages from mandatory first-party benefits; Strengthening of the threshold for bringing third-party liability lawsuits.

  • AIA says N.J. no-fault working well despite law difficulties; suggests reforms retain good features.  // Insurance Advocate;09/21/96, Vol. 107 Issue 37, p4 

    Details American Insurance Association's (AIA) objection against a bill filed to repeal New Jersey's no-fault car insurance charging that it would mean a return to a reliance on a tort litigation system which has failed before. David Snyder of AIA's testimony before a New Jersey Senate Commerce...

  • N.Y. Judge Strikes Down No-Fault Reg. 68, Calling it 'Arbitrary, Capricious' Mangan, Joseph F. // Insurance Advocate;06/17/2000, Vol. 111 Issue 25, p4 

    Reports on the decision of New York Supreme Court Judge Phyllis B. Gangel-Jacob to strike down Regulation 68 relating to the tightening of the time periods for reporting no-fault automobile insurance claims. Basis of the decision; Overview of the legislation; Focus of Jacob's analysis.

  • A fresh look at pay-at-the-pump.  // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;11/7/94, Vol. 98 Issue 45, p26 

    Editorial. Urges for a re-examination and discussion by opposing sides of the concept of pay-at-the-pump automobile insurance in light of initiatives to revive the issue. Inclusion of the no-fault component in the proposal; Effect of individual driver characteristics; Coverage for interstate...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics