What's New Under the Sun?

Buller, Kelsey
July 2012
Organic Spa Magazine;Jul2012, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p39
The article focuses on the regulation of sunscreens by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It notes that claims of sun protection for more than two hours without reapplication will be prohibited. It states that sunscreen must never be forgotten to be applied in several areas including ears, feet, and scalp. It mentions that products with broad spectrum must offer protection from aging and melanoma.


Related Articles

  • Formulator's view. Baker, Howard // Global Cosmetic Industry;Dec2000, Vol. 167 Issue 6, p56 

    Discusses the United States Food and Drug Administration's guidelines regarding sunscreens as of December 2000. Safety and effectiveness; Product labeling; Safety testing.

  • Protecting the Consumer From Getting Burned: the FDA, the Administrative Process, and the Tentative Final Monograph on Over-the-Counter Sunscreens. Jones, Patrick R. // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1994, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p317 

    Analyzes the current stage of the proposed sunscreen regulations in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consideration of conditions which compelled the FDA to act on the subject; Outline of the significant portions of proposed rules; Examination of the part of the...

  • Sunscreen shake-up.  // Shape;Jun95, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p22 

    Reports that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plans to prohibit sunscreen companies from marketing products with sun protection factor above 30. Misleading labels; Actual amount of protection given by sunscreens.

  • TRICLOSAN COMES UNDER PRESSURE. Branna, Tom // Happi: Household & Personal Products Industry;Sep2011, Vol. 48 Issue 9, p8 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including the testing and labeling requirements for sunscreens issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the issue against triclosan.

  • FDA Delays Sunscreen Monograph.  // Chemical Market Reporter;07/24/2000, Vol. 258 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports that the United States Food and Drug Administration is extending until the end of 2002 the implementation of its comprehensive sunscreen monograph. Requirement on labels of sunscreen products.

  • Dermatologists React to Sunscreen Edicts. Nash, Karen // Dermatology Times;Aug99, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p53 

    Reports on the reaction of dermatologists in the United States to the issuance of revised regulations for sunscreens by the US Food and Drug Administration. Efforts to convince patients on benefits of using sunscreens; Recommendation of sun protection factor (SPF) that have high numbers.

  • Sunscreen standstill. Jesitus, John // Dermatology Times;Aug2000, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p1 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Food and Drug Administration to extend the implementation date for its final sunscreen monograph. Reaction of dermatologists; Reason for delay of final monograph; Questionable claims about sun protection factors above 30.

  • FDA issues sunscreen rules.  // Physician & Sportsmedicine;Jul99, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p13 

    Reports on the United States Food and Drug Administration's issuance of sunscreen regulations to streamline labeling and assist consumers in making sun protection decisions. Uniform labeling system for all products that contain sunscreen; Warning label for tanning products; Ban of misleading...

  • Washington letter.  // DCI;Jan1994, Vol. 154 Issue 1, p12 

    Reports on Senator Joseph I. Lieberman's criticisms on the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) regulation of sunscreens. Comments on the publication of FDA's Final Monograph on subscreens; Lieberman's letter to FDA Commissioner David Kessler.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics