TITLE

Network Effects on Scientific Collaborations

AUTHOR(S)
Uddin, Shahadat; Hossain, Liaquat; Rasmussen, Kim
PUB. DATE
February 2013
SOURCE
PLoS ONE;Feb2013, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure on the outcome of scientific collaborations and research publications. However, little is known about what network properties are associated with authors who have increased number of joint publications and are being cited highly. Methodology/Principal Findings: Measures of social network analysis, for example network centrality and tie strength, have been utilized extensively in current co-authorship literature to explore different behavioural patterns of co-authorship networks. Using three SNA measures (i.e., degree centrality, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality), we explore scientific collaboration networks to understand factors influencing performance (i.e., citation count) and formation (tie strength between authors) of such networks. A citation count is the number of times an article is cited by other articles. We use co-authorship dataset of the research field of ‘steel structure’ for the year 2005 to 2009. To measure the strength of scientific collaboration between two authors, we consider the number of articles co-authored by them. In this study, we examine how citation count of a scientific publication is influenced by different centrality measures of its co-author(s) in a co-authorship network. We further analyze the impact of the network positions of authors on the strength of their scientific collaborations. We use both correlation and regression methods for data analysis leading to statistical validation. We identify that citation count of a research article is positively correlated with the degree centrality and betweenness centrality values of its co-author(s). Also, we reveal that degree centrality and betweenness centrality values of authors in a co-authorship network are positively correlated with the strength of their scientific collaborations. Conclusions/Significance: Authors’ network positions in co-authorship networks influence the performance (i.e., citation count) and formation (i.e., tie strength) of scientific collaborations.
ACCESSION #
87625527

 

Related Articles

  • Biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific quality. Spaan, Jos A. E. // Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing;Dec2009, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p1219 

    The author ponders on various issues biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices. He discusses the problems with biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices, along with the factors that influence the value of such indices. He argues that the indices at good tools to reflect on one's...

  • Casos de Ensino no Brasil: Análise Bibliométrica e Orientações para Autores. Faria, Marina; Fossati Figueiredo, Klebler // RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea;mar/abr2013, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p176 

    The demand for the use of active teaching methods is increasing in management courses. Correspondently, a growing number of teachers are using the case method. In order to encourage the spread of cases in Brazil, the Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em...

  • Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-index. Fu, Hui-Zhen; Ho, Yuh-Shan // Research Evaluation;Mar2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p12 

    A bibliometric index called Y-index (j, h) is developed, taking the prominent first author and corresponding author positions into account for evaluation and comparison of scientific productivity. Y-index contained two parameters: publication performance j, which is related to publication...

  • Politička sociologija u politoloÅ¡kim časopisima u Hrvatskoj. KOVAČIĆ, MARKO // Politicka Misao: Croatian Political Science Review;2014, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p39 

    The author gives an overview of political sociology as a (sub)discipline of modern political science, with special reference to Croatia. The paper consists of three parts. In the first part the method and the development of modern political sociology is given by putting special emphasis on the...

  • But Does "Ethnography By Any Other Name" Really Promote Real Ethnography? Roth, Wolff-Michael // Forum: Qualitative Social Research;Sep2006, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p1 

    Categorization--such as deciding whether something is real ethnography--is a difficult task, because nature and social practices, the topics of ethnography, themselves do not come with inherent labels. In this article, which takes its starting point in AGAR's contribution to the debate on the...

  • Reliability in Experimental Sociology. Thye, Shane R. // Social Forces;Jun2000, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p1277 

    Although scientists from various disciplines stress the importance of estimating random measurement error, these discussions have little effect on experimenters who do behavioral sociological research. There have been two important results: (i) many experimenters continue to adopt a...

  • Modeling topic control to detect influence in conversations using nonparametric topic models. Nguyen, Viet-An; Boyd-Graber, Jordan; Resnik, Philip; Cai, Deborah; Midberry, Jennifer; Wang, Yuanxin // Machine Learning;Jun2014, Vol. 95 Issue 3, p381 

    Identifying influential speakers in multi-party conversations has been the focus of research in communication, sociology, and psychology for decades. It has been long acknowledged qualitatively that controlling the topic of a conversation is a sign of influence. To capture who introduces new...

  • COLABORAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO: ANÁLISE DAS PUBLICAÇÕES EM COAUTORIA NO BRASIL NO PERÍODO 2000-2010. BALESTRIN ESPARTE, LÉLIS; BASSO, KENNY; CATELAN CALLEGARO, ANA RITA; VISENTINI, MONIZE SÂMARA; TOMAZELLI, JOANA BOESCHE; HENDERSON-ERRANDONEA, VICTORIA MARTINS // Revista Gestão Organizacional (RGO);jan-abr2013, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p77 

    One of the main trends in recent years is the increase in scientific collaboration, characterized by co-authorship. In order to describe co-authorship in management in Brazil, we analyzed the articles published in ANPAD sponsored events between the years of 2000 and 2010, totaling 34 events and...

  • THE ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION FOR THE NEW EMERGING SCIENCES: THE CASE OF SLOVENIA. GROBOLJŠEK, Blanka; FERLIGOJ, Anuška; MALI, Franc; KRONEGGER, Luka; IGLIČ, Hajdeja // Teorija in Praksa;sep/okt2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p866 

    The article addresses some issues related to the definition and analysis of scientific collaboration. Starting with a general presentation of studies on Slovenian co-authorship networks of researchers in four different disciplines, the article seeks to ascertain if there are any differences...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics