TITLE

Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis

AUTHOR(S)
Sakellariou, Garifallia; Scirè, Carlo Alberto; Zambon, Antonella; Caporali, Roberto; Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
PUB. DATE
February 2013
SOURCE
PLoS ONE;Feb2013, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the abstracts of the ACR and EULAR meetings (2010–2012) were searched for original articles or abstracts with the following inclusion criteria: 1) recent onset arthritis, with at least one swollen joint and no alternative diagnosis; 2) the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria as index test; 3) the prescription of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at any time during follow-up as reference standard. Data were pooled using the bivariate model. Three meta-analyses were performed with MTX (primary analysis), DMARDs or their combination (secondary analyses) as reference standard. Heterogeneity was formally tested and explored performing an influence analysis. Results: The search identified 1,277 references. Six full papers and 4 abstracts met the inclusion criteria. With MTX as reference standard, sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI) was 0.80 (0.74,0.85), specificity 0.61 (0.56,0.67), positive likelihood ratio (LR) 2.11 (1.92,2.32), negative LR 0.31 (0.25,0.38) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.74 (5.49,8.28). Using DMARDs as reference standard, sensitivity was 0.73 (0.64,0.80), specificity was 0.74 (0.68,0.79), LR+2.85 (2.53,3.22), LR− 0.35 (0.27,0.45) and DOR 8.03 (6.4,10.09). Using the combination of MTX and DMARDs as reference standard, intermediate results were obtained. The influence analysis detected one potentially influential study. However, its exclusion from the meta-analysis did not have a clinically relevant impact on the results. Conclusions: The new classification criteria have good sensitivity, lower specificity and an overall moderate diagnostic accuracy. These results confirm that the criteria have classificative and not diagnostic function.
ACCESSION #
87624692

 

Related Articles

  • Consenso de uso de rituximab en artritis reumatoide. Un documento con recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia. Mola, Emilio Martín; Hernández, Blanca; García-Arias, Miriam; Alvaro-Gracia, José María; Balsa, Alejandro; Reino, Juan Gómez; de la Fuente, José L. Marenco; Martínez-Taboada, Víctor; Ivorra, José Andrés Román; Sanmartí, Raimon // Reumatologia Clinica;ene/feb2011, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p30 

    Introduction: Rituximab has been employed successfully for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). However, its particular mechanism of action, as well as a lack of concrete guidelines for its management have generated doubts on its use. Objective: To establish recommendations that...

  • Intensive Intervention Can Lead to a Treatment Holiday from Biological DMARDs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Tanaka, Yoshiya; Hirata, Shintaro // Drugs;Dec2014, Vol. 74 Issue 18, p2129 

    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and joint destruction that causes significant morbidity and mortality. However, the combined use of methotrexate (MTX), a synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (sDMARD) and biological DMARDs...

  • The diagnostic value of monoclonal gastric cancer 7 antigen: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Zeng, Zongyue; Fu, Sheng; Hu, Ping; Zhao, Liuyang; Zhang, Hailong; Tang, Xi; Yang, Xiaorong; Zeng, Zhaofang // Clinical & Experimental Medicine;Aug2014, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p337 

    The aim of this study is to explore the clinical characteristic and the diagnostic role of MG7-Ag in detecting gastric cancer (GC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant manuscripts aiming at the application of serum MG7-Ag level in GC diagnosis were searched in PubMed, Embase,...

  • Is sunlight exposure a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Guo-Yuan Sui; Guang-Cong Liu; Guang-Ying Liu; Yan-Yan Gao; Yan Deng; Wen-Ying Wang; Shu-Hui Tong; Lie Wang // British Journal of Ophthalmology;Apr2013, Vol. 97 Issue 4, p389 

    Background Epidemiologists have recently investigated sunlight exposure as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but there remains an ongoing dispute over this association due to insufficient evidence and unreliable data. Objectives To analyse comprehensively the...

  • Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Blondell, Sarah J.; Hammersley-Mather, Rachel; Lennert Veerman, Jacob // BMC Public Health;2014, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1036 

    Background By 2050, it has been estimated that approximately one-fifth of the population will be made up of older adults (aged ≥60 years). Old age often comes with cognitive decline and dementia. Physical activity may prevent cognitive decline and dementia. Methods We reviewed and...

  • National Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. Badii, Maziar // Clinical & Investigative Medicine;Apr99, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p63 

    Provides information on the 62nd meeting of the American College of Rheumatology on November 1998 in San Diego, California. Approaches to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade; Leflunomide; Combination second-line therapy.

  • The Cochrane Collaboration and Meta-analysis of Clinical Data. Beaudet, Kimberly // American Orthoptic Journal;2010, Vol. 60, p6 

    The Cochrane Collaboration is an international not-for-profit and independent organization, dedicated to making up-to-date, accurate information about the effects of healthcare readily available worldwide. It produces and disseminates systematic reviews of healthcare interventions and promotes...

  • Systematic reviews: what can they do for you? Duley, Lelia // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;May1996, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p242 

    The article discusses the use of high-quality systematic reviews by clinicians to assess the effects of health care interventions. The most reliable guide to clinical practice will come from a comprehensive and objective review of all available trials, rather than from a single study. The best...

  • Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias. Doucet, M.; Sismondo, S. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Aug2008, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p627 

    More than 40 primary studies, and three recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, have shown a clear association between pharmaceutical industry funding of clinical trials and pro-industry results. Industry sponsorship biases published scientific research in favour of the sponsors, a result...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics