TITLE

Decision Rules and Group Rationality: Cognitive Gain or Standstill?

AUTHOR(S)
Curşeu, Petru Lucian; Jansen, Rob J. G.; Chappin, Maryse M. H.
PUB. DATE
February 2013
SOURCE
PLoS ONE;Feb2013, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Recent research in group cognition points towards the existence of collective cognitive competencies that transcend individual group members’ cognitive competencies. Since rationality is a key cognitive competence for group decision making, and group cognition emerges from the coordination of individual cognition during social interactions, this study tests the extent to which collaborative and consultative decision rules impact the emergence of group rationality. Using a set of decision tasks adapted from the heuristics and biases literature, we evaluate rationality as the extent to which individual choices are aligned with a normative ideal. We further operationalize group rationality as cognitive synergy (the extent to which collective rationality exceeds average or best individual rationality in the group), and we test the effect of collaborative and consultative decision rules in a sample of 176 groups. Our results show that the collaborative decision rule has superior synergic effects as compared to the consultative decision rule. The ninety one groups working in a collaborative fashion made more rational choices (above and beyond the average rationality of their members) than the eighty five groups working in a consultative fashion. Moreover, the groups using a collaborative decision rule were closer to the rationality of their best member than groups using consultative decision rules. Nevertheless, on average groups did not outperformed their best member. Therefore, our results reveal how decision rules prescribing interpersonal interactions impact on the emergence of collective cognitive competencies. They also open potential venues for further research on the emergence of collective rationality in human decision-making groups.
ACCESSION #
87624623

 

Related Articles

  • People with Easier to Pronounce Names Promote Truthiness of Claims. Newman, Eryn J.; Sanson, Mevagh; Miller, Emily K.; Quigley-McBride, Adele; Foster, Jeffrey L.; Bernstein, Daniel M.; Garry, Maryanne // PLoS ONE;Feb2014, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p1 

    When people make judgments about the truth of a claim, related but nonprobative information rapidly leads them to believe the claim–an effect called “truthiness” [1]. Would the pronounceability of others’ names also influence the truthiness of claims attributed to them?...

  • “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory Furley, Philip; Memmert, Daniel // PLoS ONE;May2013, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p1 

    Three experiments investigated the predictions of the biased competition theory of selective attention in a computer based sport task. According to this theory objects held in the circuitry of working memory (WM) automatically bias attention to objects in a visual scene that match or are related...

  • COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR COMBINING INCOMPLETE SETS OF RANK-ORDER DATA. Shaw, David O.; Osburn, H. G. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Dec70, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p526 

    A relatively exhaustive exploration of method accuracy in combining incomplete rankings randomly sampled from various computer-generated populations with known assumptions and parameter settings is reported. Contrary to the findings of earlier studies, very significant differences between...

  • Economic Decisions for Others: An Exception to Loss Aversion Law. Mengarelli, Flavia; Moretti, Laura; Faralla, Valeria; Vindras, Philippe; Sirigu, Angela // PLoS ONE;Jan2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1 

    In everyday life, people often make decisions on behalf of others. The current study investigates whether risk preferences of decision-makers differ when the reference point is no longer their own money but somebody else money. Thirty four healthy participants performed three different monetary...

  • TREÅšCI KOGNITYWNE I METODOLOGICZNE PSYCHOLOGII SPOŁECZNEJ I POZNAWCZEJ W KONTEKÅšCIE NAUK O ZARZÄ„DZANIU. Piórkowska, Katarzyna // Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace N;2014, Issue 340, p112 

    The goal of the article is to make conclusions for management science resulting from social and cognitive psychology via the discussion about permeating management science and psychology (social and cognitive) as well as to answer the following question: Is it possible to cognitively and...

  • Decision importance as a cue for deferral. Krijnen, Job M. T.; Zeelenberg, Marcel; Breugelmans, Seger M. // Judgment & Decision Making;Sep2015, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p407 

    A series of 7 experiments found that people defer important decisions more than unimportant decisions, and that this is independent of choice set composition. This finding persists even when deferral does not provide more flexibility (Experiment 2), when deferral has potential disadvantages...

  • Driven by Power? Probe Question and Presentation Format Effects on Causal Judgment. Perales, José C.; Shanks, David R. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition;Nov2008, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p1482 

    It has been proposed that causal power (defined as the probability with which a candidate cause would produce an effect in the absence of any other background causes) can be intuitively computed from cause-effect covariation information. Estimation of power is assumed to require a special type...

  • Smaller Is Better (When Sampling From the Crowd Within): Low Memory-Span Individuals Benefit More From Multiple Opportunities for Estimation. Hourihan, Kathleen L.; Benjamin, Aaron S. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition;Jul2010, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p1068 

    Recently, Vul and Pashler (2008) demonstrated that the average of 2 responses from a single subject to general knowledge questions was more accurate than either single estimate. Importantly, this reveals that each guess contributes unique evidence relevant to the decision, contrary to views that...

  • OPTIMAL VIEWING POSITION EFFECT OF CONNECTING AND UN-CONNECTING LETTERS WITHIN LETTER-STRING IN ARABIC. GANAYIM, DEIA // Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology;Nov2015, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p9 

    The current study investigates the role of Arabic letter visibility as a possible cause of the Optimal Viewing Position-OVP effect. We used connecting and unconnecting Arabic letters of different shapes (basic, initial, medial, final) placed at the various possible positions within connecting...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics