Are Treponema pallidum Specific Rapid and Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis Accurate Enough for Screening in Resource Limited Settings? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Jafari, Yalda; Peeling, Rosanna W.; Shivkumar, Sushmita; Claessens, Christiane; Joseph, Lawrence; Pai, Nitika Pant
February 2013
PLoS ONE;Feb2013, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p1
Academic Journal
Background: Rapid and point-of-care (POC) tests for syphilis are an invaluable screening tool, yet inadequate evaluation of their diagnostic accuracy against best reference standards limits their widespread global uptake. To fill this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of rapid and POC tests in blood and serum samples against Treponema pallidum (TP) specific reference standards. Methods: Five electronic databases (1980–2012) were searched, data was extracted from 33 articles, and Bayesian hierarchical models were fit. Results: In serum samples, against a TP specific reference standard point estimates with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the sensitivities of popular tests were: i) Determine, 90.04% (80.45, 95.21), ii) SD Bioline, 87.06% (75.67, 94.50), iii) VisiTect, 85.13% (72.83, 92.57), and iv) Syphicheck, 74.48% (56.85, 88.44), while specificities were: i) Syphicheck, 99.14% (96.37, 100), ii) Visitect, 96.45% (91.92, 99.29), iii) SD Bioline, 95.85% (89.89, 99.53), and iv) Determine, 94.15% (89.26, 97.66). In whole blood samples, sensitivities were: i) Determine, 86.32% (77.26, 91.70), ii) SD Bioline, 84.50% (78.81, 92.61), iii) Syphicheck, 74.47% (63.94, 82.13), and iv) VisiTect, 74.26% (53.62, 83.68), while specificities were: i) Syphicheck, 99.58% (98.91, 99.96), ii) VisiTect, 99.43% (98.22, 99.98), iii) SD Bioline, 97.95%(92.54, 99.33), and iv) Determine, 95.85% (92.42, 97.74). Conclusions: Rapid and POC treponemal tests reported sensitivity and specificity estimates comparable to laboratory-based treponemal tests. In resource limited settings, where access to screening is limited and where risk of patients lost to follow up is high, the introduction of these tests has already been shown to improve access to screening and treatment to prevent stillbirths and neonatal mortality due to congenital syphilis. Based on the evidence, it is concluded that rapid and POC tests are useful in resource limited settings with poor access to laboratories or screening for syphilis.


Related Articles

  • Usefulness in clinical practice of a point-of-care rapid test for simultaneous detection of nontreponemal and Treponema pallidum-specific antibodies in patients suffering from documented syphilis. Guinard, Jérôme; Prazuck, Thierry; Péré, Hélène; Poirier, Claire; LeGoff, Jérôme; Boedec, Erwan; Guigon, Aurélie; Day, Nesrine; Bélec, Laurent // International Journal of STD & AIDS;Dec2013, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p944 

    The usefulness of a point-of-care immunochromatographic dual test for the simultaneous detection of both nontreponemal and Treponema pallidum-specific antibodies (Chembio Diagnostics Systems Inc., Medford, NY, USA) was assessed in various situations related to syphilis, by reference to...

  • Near-patient testing in primary care. Khunti, Kamlesh // British Journal of General Practice;Mar2010, Vol. 60 Issue 572, p157 

    The author reflects on the implementation of the concept of near-patient testing (NPT) in primary care (PC) in Great Britain. He cites the potential advantages of NPT which include improved patient satisfaction and earlier diagnosis. He mentions a study on patient satisfaction in relation to...

  • Reply to Llor and Butler. Jackson, Audrey F.; Caliendo, Angela M. // Clinical Infectious Diseases;May2014, Vol. 58 Issue 10, p1488 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Better tests also in primary care" by C. Llor and C.C. Butler in the previous issue.

  • Oral Presentations.  // Annals of Clinical Biochemistry;Mar2007 Supplement, Vol. 44, p24 

    The article presents abstracts of oral presentations related to clinical biochemistry. They include "Impact of reporting e-GFR results to Primary Care Practitioners in NHS Grampian," "All singing from the same hymn sheet: the POCT co-ordinator's forum in Wales," and "Improving the efficiency of...

  • Evaluating the impact of point- of-care decision support tools in improving diagnosis of obese children in primary care. Ayash, Christine R.; Simon, Steven R.; Marshall, Richard; Kasper, Jill; Chomitz, Virginia; Hacker, Karen; Kleinman, Ken P.; Taveras, Elsie M. // Obesity (19307381);Mar2013, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p576 

    Objective: The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine the effect of a computerized point-of-care alert with clinical decision support on the rates of diagnosis of childhood obesity in a multisite group practice in Massachusetts; Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) which implemented...

  • A primer on burn resuscitation. Bacomo, Ferdinand K.; Chung, Kevin K. // Journal of Emergencies, Trauma & Shock;Jan2011, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p109 

    Since the early 1900s, the scope of burn resuscitation has evolved dramatically. Due to various advances in pre-hospital care and training, under-resuscitation of patients with severe burns is now relatively uncommon. Over-resuscitation, otherwise known as "fluid creep", has emerged as one of...

  • Urea breath testing and analysis in the primary care office. Opekun, Antone R.; Abdalla, Nageeb; Sutton, Fred M.; Hammoud, Fadi; Kuo, Grace M.; Torres, Elizabeth; Steinbauer, Jeffrey; Graham, David Y. // Journal of Family Practice;Dec2002, Vol. 51 Issue 12, p1030 

    The 13C-urea breath test provides accurate, noninvasive diagnosis of active Helicohacler pylori infection and can document posttherapy cure. This study evaluated point-of-care testing with onsite sample analysis with the use of a desktop infrared spectrophotometer. Ambulatory patients (N = 320)...

  • Better Tests Also in Primary Care. Llor, Carl; Butler, Christopher C. // Clinical Infectious Diseases;May2014, Vol. 58 Issue 10, p1487 

    A letter to the editor related to a policy paper released by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) on the need for better point-of-care tests (POCTs) for improved clinical care for infectious diseases.

  • Near-patient tests not the answer.  // Pulse;5/3/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 17, p16 

    The article focuses on the significance of near-patient tests assessment for diabetes. It could be noted that researchers who assessed the tests cannot recommend a primary care rollout. They find high levels of satisfaction in tests among the patients and primary care professionals. It was found...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics