TITLE

TWO LABOR RULES RESCINDED

PUB. DATE
May 2002
SOURCE
FoodService Director;5/15/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information on rulings issued by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding rules imposed on food service operators and other employers. Judgment regarding the enforcement policy of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board; Restrictions on the ability of the U.S. Labor Department to penalize employers regarding maternity or medical leave policies; Overview of the Family and Medical Leave Act.
ACCESSION #
8653125

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Strikes Down Department of Labor's Regulation on Notice of FMLA Leave. Brady, Holly A. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the regulation of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regarding the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. The regulation of the DOL provides that the 12-week leave of an employee under the FMLA does not begin to run...

  • Ruling applies family leave act to state workers.  // Nation's Health;Aug2003, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p7 

    Focuses on the Family and Medical Leave Act in the U.S. Provisions of the act; Ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case of the Nevada Department of Human Resources versus Hibbs regarding family leave protections; Increase in the number of working mothers in the U.S. between 1970 and 2000.

  • What Does the Supreme Court's New FMLA Decision Mean for Employers?  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) regulation that precludes employers who fail to give notice of FMLA leave designation to employees within two business days from counting any of the leave taken before the...

  • Labor Department's About-Face: Family leave benefits proposed.  // FoodService Director;02/15/2000, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p18 

    Looks at the policy of the United States Department of Labor concerning the Federal Unemployment Tax Act. Possible effect of the policy on foodservice industry workers; Details on the family leave benefits and unemployment insurance compensation.

  • Supreme Court to Decide FMLA Question.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Ragsdale versus Wolverine Worldwide Inc. in January 2002, to resolve a split among the federal circuit courts over the validity of a Department of Labor (DOL) regulation interpreting the Family and Medical...

  • High Court Rejects Penalty Imposed by Department of Labor Regulations in First Supreme Court Decision Under the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act. Alvarez, Frank // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Ragsdale versus Wolverine Worldwide Inc. The ruling invalidates the regulation of the U.S. Department of Labor that penalize employers by requiring them to provide additional 12 weeks of leave to employees who had not received the...

  • 'Willful' Violation Defined Under FMLA. Flannigan, Paul // HR Magazine;Mar2005, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p116 

    Focuses on a ruling of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a case regarding the interpretation of willful violation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) filed against Lake County Board of Commissioners in Florida by Susan Hanger, head of the human resource and safety department of...

  • Underscoring the Need to Correct Gender Bias, Supreme Court Rules FMLA Covers State Employees. Alvarez, Frank // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q2, p1 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the U. S. Supreme Court that the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) also applies to state governments and that state employees entitled to the same FMLA rights as private sector employees. Previous decisions by the Court had excluded the states from...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Invalidates FMLA Regulation. Rahilly, Lisa Richards // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in a case filed by employee Tracy Ragsdale against Wolverine World Wide Inc. to invalidate the 29 Code of Federal Regulations § 825.700a regulation under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Ragsdale has argued that she was entitled...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics