Supervisor and worker couldn't agree on whether or not she resigned

March 2013
Legal Alert for Supervisors;3/29/2013, Vol. 8 Issue 189, p1
The article focuses on the statements of resources director Carolyn Kelliher and supervisor Nathan Hawkins about the age discrimination lawsuit filed by a female Teleflex employee named Mary who had a disagreement with a department head who assumed that she resigned. It discusses the claims of Hawkins and Kelliher that Mary is offended by the attitude of her supervisor while she is training him on departmental duties. It examines the court's refusal to throw out the case. INSET: What it means to you.


Related Articles

  • Woman observes shocking behavior in the 'boys' club,' sues for discrimination.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;12/14/2009, Vol. 5 Issue 109, p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a woman named Melissa was allegedly discriminated in a department of a company whose members are all males. It states that the company was sued due to the discriminatory behavior. It also presents the statements of Nathan Hawkins, the supervisor, and...

  • Supervisor: 'I hope the swine flu hits my department to clean out the older folks'.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors; 

    The article discusses the court case Preuss, Bloomer, and Cafiero v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., in which the oldest employees of the company were targeted for layoffs. The employees argued that according to the company's layoff policy, the least senior employees were supposed to be let go first....

  • labor-management relations.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep93, Vol. 44 Issue 9, p589 

    Presents news briefs on industrial relations in the U.S. as of September 1993. Decision on the race discrimination claim filed by an African American supervisor in the Supreme Court; Provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act related to injury claims; Revision of the union...

  • equal employment opportunity.  // Labor Law Journal;Nov82, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p751 

    The article presents information on developments related to equal employment opportunity issues in the United States. In the lawsuit EEOC v. Spokane Concrete Products, Inc., a trial court in Washington ruled that the rejection of a qualified female applicant for a truck-driving job because she...

  • Bid to beat bias claim time bar fails. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;9/17/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 38, p4 

    The article reports on a ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that prevents terminated employees in Eastern states from keeping their age discrimination claims alive against former employers by linking them to related litigation. It says that this ruling which overturned a lower...

  • Age-Based Limits on Pension Contributions Upheld by Quebec Court of Appeal. Giroux, Mireille // Plans & Trusts;Jan/Feb2012, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p10 

    The article discusses a court case, Velk c. Université McGill/McGill University, wherein the plaintiffs challenge the university's restrictions on pension contributions. The professors brought a motion for a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction, claiming that they were deprived of...

  • AGE AS 'BUT-FOR' CAUSE UNDER ADEA. E. Hall, James; T. Kobata, Mark; Denis, Marty // Workforce Management;7/20/2009, Vol. 88 Issue 8, p10 

    The article presents the court case Gross v. FBL Financial Services Inc. Jack Gross filed a law suit alleging that FBL demoted him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The district court instructed the jury to enter an award for Gross if he proved that he was demoted and his...

  • Supreme Court Dismisses ADEA Case.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss a case that would have decided a longstanding question of whether disparate impact claims are available under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The two types of discrimination claims include disparate impact and...

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Wooster.  // Employers Law;Nov2009, p8 

    The article discusses the court case London Borough of Tower Hamlets v. Wooster wherein Wooster was discriminated against on the grounds of age by being made redundant at 49. The British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld the decision of an Employment Tribunal regarding the claim of Wooster...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics