Marks, Alexia Brunet
January 2013
Houston Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p723
Academic Journal
Food safety is a hotly debated issue. While food nourishes, sustains, and enriches our lives, it can also kill us. At any given meal, our menu comes from a dozen different sources. Without proper incentives to encourage food safety, microbial pathogens can, and do enter the food source--so much so that according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), each year roughly one in six Americans (or forty-eight million people) gets sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases. What is the optimal way to prevent unsafe foods from entering the marketplace? Safety in the food system emerges from a delicate interplay of several sources--direct regulation, legal liability, and market response. And yet food safety is a largely unexplored area in legal scholarship. This Article fills this void by examining the contribution of legal liability first as an economic signal to deter firms from producing unsafe food and then as an indirect regulator promoting food safety. Two parts follow. Part I examines the efficacy of legal liability to deter firms from producing unsafe food. I estimate an empirical model using all (320) publicly recorded foodborne illness settlements and verdicts in the U.S. from 2000-2011, to determine factors that influence the plaintiff win rate, resolution time, and plaintiff recovery. Statistically significant results include: Plaintiffs who sue for foodborne illness injuries win more often and win more monetary damages when they settle. Cases are resolved faster and damages are higher when the plaintiffs attorney is ranked and an expert in the field. Interestingly, in states where punitive damage limits are in place, plaintiffs resolve their cases faster, they are more likely to win, and they collect more damages in general. When the plaintiff suffers the gravest injury (death), the case takes longer to resolve and damages are higher. Plaintiffs also win more damages when the injury takes place in a state that has an efficient public health reporting system. The results suggest that as a cost of doing business, foodborne illness litigation sends a strong signal to firms to increase food safety practices--but only when cases settle and not necessarily when they reach a jury trial. The way in which the results highlight the existence of market failures in providing food safety--the transaction costs and the information costs preventing plaintiffs from suing in the first place and from recovering fully--presents valuable information for regulators. Part II contributes to the understanding and active debate surrounding the interplay between legal liability and food safety regulation, suggesting the optimal way for these two deterrence mechanisms to interact. My solution is for regulation to be responsive to foodborne illness litigation. This Article advocates for empirically informed regulation and contributes to the literature of tort law, law and economics, and food safety. The new Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), promulgated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has the potential to aid plaintiffs in overcoming causation and traceability concerns with their claims. Concrete recommendations seek to inform an audience of regulators currently drafting the final rules.


Related Articles

  • Handwashing Versus Alcohol-Based Gels---FDA Information.  // Journal of Environmental Health;Sep2003, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p40 

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are working together to control the transmission of pathogens that can result in foodborne illnesses. Transmission of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites from raw food or from ill workers...

  • SAFETY FIRST. Sung, Amy // SN: Supermarket News;4/27/2009, Vol. 57 Issue 17, p23 

    The article discusses issues related to food safety system in the U.S. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 76 million people in the U.S. suffer from foodborne illnesses each year, 300,000 are hospitalized and 5,000 die. Food safety reform has remained in the...

  • In Focus: Examining the New FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. Eads, Kristin; Zwagerman, Jennifer // Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy;Fall2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p123 

    The article presents information on the enactment of the Food Safety Modernization Act by the Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. for the purpose of the safety of foods. The estimates on the death of people of the U.S. due food-borne disease is provided by the Centers for Disease Control...

  • Food Safety Regulation in the United States: An Empirical and Theoretical Examination. YASUDA, TOMOHIDE // Independent Review;Fall2010, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p201 

    In this article the author examines food safety regulations in the United States. In considering the effectiveness of such regulation the author demonstrates that the regulations were not apparent in the statistics compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on food-borne illness...

  • Will the Food Safety Modernization Act Help Prevent Outbreaks of Foodborne Illness? Taylor, Michael R. // New England Journal of Medicine;9/1/2011, Vol. 365 Issue 9, pN.PAG 

    The author reflects on the potential role of the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) in preventing foodborne illness outbreaks. The law, enacted on January 4, 2011, gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) a mandate and toolkit to improve food supply safety. It also has provisions...

  • What did you learn this summer? Stier, Richard F. // Food Engineering;Oct2008, Vol. 80 Issue 10, p24 

    The article presents update on food safety in the U.S. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initially linked the foodborne illness outbreaks in the country to fresh tomatoes. The Food and Drug Administration announced amended food additive regulations, allowing fresh iceberg lettuce...

  • safety of food supply in question.  // IDEA Fitness Journal;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 6 Issue 7, p82 

    The article offers information on a report released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service, and the Food and Drug Administration that examined the safety of food supply. The report revealed that from 1999-2009, the...

  • Whole Foods: The FSMA and the Challenges of Defragmenting Food Safety Regulation. Tai, Stephanie // Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts;2015, Vol. 41 Issue 2/3, p447 

    The article focuses on the challenges faced by the food safety regulatory system due to its fragmentation in the U.S. It mentions the measures taken by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration and Environmental Protection Agency towards safety of food, introducing Working...

  • Using a Theoretical Predictive Tool for the Analysis of Recent Health Department Inspections at Outbreak Restaurants and Relation of This Information to Foodborne Illness Likelihood. PETRAN, RUTH L.; WHITE, BRUCE W.; HEDBERG, CRAIG W. // Journal of Food Protection;Nov2012, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p2016 

    Because U.S. restaurants are inspected at least annually against criteria in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Model Food Code, large amounts of data are generated and should be systematically reviewed. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships among the data obtained...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics