Regulators' Reputation Sinks Along with Industry's

Rehm, Barbara A.
March 2013
American Banker;3/28/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 48, p14
Trade Publication
The article presents the author's perspective on federal regulators and the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The author says the law gave federal banking agencies power and authority but they have not restored Americans' confidence in the government's ability to regulate the financial system. The topics discussed include bureaucracy, systemically important financial institutions, and the seizure and liquidation of large financial institutions.


Related Articles

  • Abuse Standard's Unclear And Banks Clearly Dislike It. Davidson, Kate // American Banker;9/6/2011, Vol. 176 Issue 137, p1 

    The article discusses the meaning of "abusive" practices, a term in the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act that is a standard by which the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau can prohibit specific practices by financial institutions. The issue of making a distinction between practices that are abusive and...

  • Carving Up Big Banks Won't Work, Any Way You Slice It. Rehm, Barbara A. // American Banker;4/26/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 65, p1 

    The article presents the author's view that U.S. banks considered to be too big to fail (TBTF) and are a threat to the financial system's stability should be broken up but will not be because federal regulatory agencies have the power to control financial institutions. The politicization of...

  • A Lengthy Still-to-Do List Faces Dodd-Frank. Wack, Kevin // American Banker;7/19/2011, Vol. 176 Issue 110, p1 

    The article discusses the slow implementation of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. The regulatory reform issues such as the systemic identification of financial institutions that are too big to fail and the Volcker Rule for derivative trading are discussed. The Office of Financial Research's lack...

  • Doubts Mount Over Stress Test Consistency. Adler, Joe // American Banker;2/3/2012, Vol. 177 Issue F305, p1 

    The article focuses on the idea that stress testing for financial institutions, required by the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act, will not be uniform unless three regulatory agencies agree on a standard. The pros and cons of the three agencies, Federal Reserve Board, Deposit Insurance Corp., and Office of...

  • On UDAP Beat, CFPB Bumps Into Other Cops. Adler, Joe // American Banker;5/15/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 75, p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Act or Practice law and the authority given to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the Dodd-Frank Act to write rules for bank and nonbank institutions and enforce compliance. The regulatory authority of the Federal...

  • Regulating Ex Post: How Law Can Address the Inevitability of Financial Failure. Anabtawi, Iman; Schwarcz, Steven L. // Texas Law Review;Nov2013, Vol. 92 Issue 1, p75 

    Unlike many other areas of regulation, financial regulation operates in the context of a complex interdependent system. The interconnections among firms, markets, and legal rules have implications for financial regulatory policy, especially the choice between ex ante regulation aimed at...

  • OCC Gets It Wrong on Preemption, Again. Wilmarth Jr., Arthur E. // American Banker;7/29/2011, Vol. 176 Issue F329, p8 

    The article presents the author's view that the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) violated the Dodd-Frank Act when the agency issued its governing or regulatory preemption standards in 2011. Section 1044(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the OCC's re-adoption of the 2004 rules, and...

  • REFORMING REGULATION IN THE MARKETS FOR HOME LOANS. Block-Lieb, Susan; Janger, Edward J. // Fordham Urban Law Journal;Mar2011, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p681 

    The article discusses the content and institutional context of the revised rules for residential mortgages in the U.S. It offers recommendations on the potential changes to the Dodd-Frank Act related to its safety, liquidity and soundness in financial markets. It also explores the interactions...

  • MORE ON DODD-FRANK EFFECTIVE DATES. PANNABECKER, JAMES H. // Bankers Letter of the Law;Oct2012, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p1 

    The article discusses the effective dates of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act. The Congress made amendments to effective dates to be specified by government agencies. Several courts have offered opinions on the subject matter. A provision of the law requires the adoption of regulations that will take...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics