TITLE

Implementation and Research Priorities for FCTC Articles 13 and 16: Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship and Sales to and by Minors

AUTHOR(S)
Nagler, Rebekah H.; Viswanath, Kasisomayajula
PUB. DATE
April 2013
SOURCE
Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Apr2013, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p832
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Article 13 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) calls for a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (TAPS), and Article 16 calls for prohibition of tobacco sales to and by minors. Although these mandates are based on sound science, many countries have found provision implementation to be rife with challenges. Objective: This paper reviews the history of tobacco marketing and minor access restrictions in high-, middle-, and low-income countries, identifying past challenges and successes. We consider current challenges to FCTC implementation, how these barriers can be addressed, and what research is necessary to support such efforts. Specifically, we identify implementation and research priorities for FCTC Articles 13 and 16. Discussion: Although a solid evidence base underpins the FCTC’s call for TAPS bans and minor access restrictions, we know substantially less about how best to implement these restrictions. Drawing on the regulatory experiences of high-, middle-, and low-income countries, we discern several implementation and research priorities, which are organized into 4 categories: policy enactment and enforcement, human capital expertise, the effects of FCTC marketing and youth access policies, and knowledge exchange and transfer among signatories. Future research should provide detailed case studies on implementation successes and failures, as well as insights into how knowledge of successful restrictions can be translated into tobacco control policy and practice and shared among different stakeholders. Conclusion: Tobacco marketing surveillance, sales-to-minors compliance checks, enforcement and evaluation of restriction policies, and capacity building and knowledge transfer are likely to prove central to effective implementation.
ACCESSION #
86428857

 

Related Articles

  • Snuffing Out Tobacco Ads. Stephenson, Joan // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;12/12/2001, Vol. 286 Issue 22, p2801 

    Reports that the World Health Organization (WHO) is calling on countries to enact tough legal restrictions on tobacco advertising. Statement of WHO Director-General Gro Harlem Brundtland that tobacco companies are incapable of self-regulating; Public-relations campaigns of tobacco companies;...

  • Tobacco ads saved--but not for long. Kleinman, Mark // Marketing (00253650);10/12/2000, p9 

    Focuses on tobacco manufacturers' response to the decision of the European Court of Justice to rule against the proposed ban on cigarette advertising throughout Europe. Decision of the government of Great Britain to retain legislation outlawing tobacco advertisements in the country; Tobacco...

  • European Union OKs tobacco ad ban. Bidlake, Suzanne // Advertising Age;12/8/1997, Vol. 68 Issue 49, p51 

    The article reports that the member countries of the European Union have agreed to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship through a Council of Ministers agreement. It is expected that after the European Union enacts the agreement, member countries will have three years to enact the law....

  • Building tobacco control research in Thailand: meeting the need for innovative change in Asia.  // Health Research Policy & Systems;2012, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p3 

    The article presents a study analyzing the development of tobacco control research capacity in Thailand and the impact of research on Thai tobacco control measures which includes taxation, bans on tobacco advertising, and social marketing campaigns. It is mentioned that, Thai tobacco control...

  • Euro Parliament questions its own right to ban tobacco ads as it faces legal challenge.  // Marketing Week;11/29/2001, Vol. 24 Issue 42, p7 

    Reports that plans for a Europe-wide ban on tobacco advertising suffered a setback in November 2001 after the European Parliament's legal affairs committee questioned the legal basis for the proposed directive. Committee members' argument that the directive does not fall under the remit of the...

  • BRAZIL TO CUT TOBACCO ADS. Cajueiro, Marcelo // Daily Variety;12/27/2000, Vol. 270 Issue 18, p10 

    Reports that the Brazilian Congress has passed a bill banning tobacco firms from buying advertising time and sponsoring events.

  • Tobacco ads ban looms closer.  // In-Store Marketing;Dec2002, p5 

    Reports on the proposed British law that will ban tobacco advertising except on the containers in which tobacco products are carried. Impact of the bill on the tobacco and cigarette industry; Reaction of tobacco and cigarette manufacturers to the proposed bill.

  • Tobacco body to drop ad ban role. Rogers, Daniel // Marketing (00253650);1/10/2002, p2 

    Focuses on the decline of the tobacco industry from the tobacco advertising ban in Great Britain. Replacement of chief executive David Swan with Tim Lord; Support of the government on the Private Member's Bill; Assessment on the Bill's proposal.

  • Tobacco companies' right to advertise back to Supreme Court? Lightstone, Susan // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;4/1/2003, Vol. 168 Issue 7, p882 

    Discusses if tobacco companies have the rights to advertise under Canada's Tobacco Act. Debate surrounding the December 13, 2002 decision, which severely restricts the tobacco industry's ability to advertise and market its products; Freedom of expression versus the protection of public health'...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics