February 2013
Travel Weekly (UK);2/28/2013, Issue 2157, p28
Trade Publication
The article discusses the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) at 2011 cases Ewedia and Chaplin v. UK and Ladele and McFarlane v. UK and tackles the rights of employees on what to wear during work.


Related Articles

  • The Implications of Wilson and Palmer. EWING, K. D. // Industrial Law Journal;Mar2003, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p1 

    The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Wilson and Palmer case has far‐reaching implications for British labour law. It is also the most significant decision so far on the scope of Article 11 of the ECHR. This article considers the changes to domestic labour law which...

  • Private Life and Dismissal. MANTOUVALOU, VIRGINIA; COLLINS, HUGH // Industrial Law Journal;Mar2009, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p133 

    The article reports on the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on the case Pay v UK in the context of claims for unfair dismissal in Great Britain. The highlights of the case is discussed. The two stages in the decision making in the ECtHR involved the admissibility of a...

  • Eweida v United Kingdom. BIDDULPH, MICHELLE; NEWMAN, DWIGHT // Australian International Law Journal;2013, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p183 

    The article focuses on the European Court of Human Rights court case Eweida v. United Kingdom, which dealt with freedom of religion in Great Britain. Topics include the freedom to resign, religious rights in Great Britain, and freedom of religion in the workplace. Information is provided on...

  • Members, Partners, Employees, Workers? Partnership Law and Employment Status revisited. Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof. Prassl, Jeremias // Industrial Law Journal;Dec2014, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p495 

    The recent Supreme Court decision in Clyde & Co v Bates van Winkelhof1 at first sight addresses no more than a rather technical point at the intersection of employment and partnership law, brought about as the result of questionable statutory drafting in section 4(4) of the Limited Liability...

  • Law against sympathy strikes is lawful, rules European court.  // Employers Law;May2014, p5 

    The article reports on the European Court of Human Rights' (ECHR) ruling that a British law preventing secondary industrial action or sympathy strikes is lawful, in response to a complaint from the British National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) union.

  • Issues of enforcement by Ukraine the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Vintsislavslaya, M. V. // Russian Juridical Journal / Rossijskij Juridiceskij Zurnal;2013, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p132 

    The article is devoted to enforcement by Ukraine the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The reasons of non-enforcement and possible solutions to the problem are analyzed. Problems associated with the payment of just satisfaction, the use of additional individual and general...

  • UTJECAJ PRAKSE (PRESUDA) EUROPSKOG SUDA ZA ZAÅ TITU LJUDSKIH PRAVA NA UPRAVNO SUDOVANJE U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ. Šikić, Marko // Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split;2013, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p457 

    This paper analyses the court decisions of the European Court of Human Rights reached in proceedings against the Republic of Croatia and which directly or indirectly have influenced administrative adjudication process in the Republic of Croatia. In that sense, firstly and briefly court decisions...

  • Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights. Dothan, Sh. // Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukraini;2013, Issue 3, p142 

    The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been criticized for issuing harsher judgments against developing states than it does against the states of Western Europe. It has also been seen by some observers as issuing increasingly demanding judgments. This paper develops a theory of judicial...

  • SPAIN:. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;11/11/2013, pA02 

    SPAIN: A Spanish court ordered the release of 9 members of Basque separatist group ETA. The court was forced by a European Court of Human Rights ruling last month, which found that Spain had acted illegally when it retroactively cut short the years of "time off " earned by 1 of the prisoners for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics