TITLE

The Relationship Between Foundations and Principles in IP Law

AUTHOR(S)
MERGES, ROBERT P.
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
San Diego Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p957
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on basic principles concerning foundations of the field of intellectual property (IP) law. It provides information on the basic principles of IP law which include efficiency, proportionality and dignity. It stresses on the granting of IP rights to make a workable foundation. It rejects utilitarianism for lack of precise data and presents an analysis of the three levels of IP law with the help of new technologies.
ACCESSION #
86412321

 

Related Articles

  • Reflecting on the Common Discourse on Piracy and Intellectual Property Rights: A Divergent Perspective. Yung, Betty // Journal of Business Ethics;Jun2009, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p45 

    The common discourse on intellectual property rights rests mainly on utilitarian ground, with implications on the question of justice as well as moral significance. It runs like this: Intellectual property rights are to reward the originators for his/her intellectual labour mainly in monetary...

  • Patently Absurd: The Ethical Implications of Software Patents. Stark, Chris D. // TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p58 

    The article focuses on the ethical implications of software patents, a patent intended to prevent others from using some programming technique. The author stressed that abuses of intellectual property laws have put software innovation in peril. The spread of software patents stifle innovation...

  • Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property. Lewin, Peter // Journal of Business Ethics;Apr2007, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p441 

    Part one of this paper considers the question of property rights in general and asks how such rights can be justified, contrasting Consequentialist with other approaches and concludes that it is impossible to avoid a broadly Consequentialist approach. Part two considers the question of...

  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'S NEGATIVE SPACE: BEYOND THE UTILITARIAN. ROSENBLATT, ELIZABETH L. // Florida State University Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p441 

    A growing body of scholarship addresses intellectual property's "negative spaces": areas in which creation and innovation thrive without significant formal protection from intellectual property law. A number of negative space scholars have used case studies to examine the relationship between...

  • Universities, industry near research pact. Rademacher, Kevin // Inside Tucson Business;02/15/99, Vol. 8 Issue 47, p1 

    Reports that universities and businesses in Arizona are completing an initiative to introduce a comprehensive update to the state's intellectual property and technology transfer policies. Expectations for the passage of the updates through the review process; Factors considered in the...

  • Keeping Pace With Dubai's Tech Boom. Fred, Sheryl // Corporate Legal Times;Nov2002, Vol. 12 Issue 132, p43 

    Focuses on the growth of the technology industry in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Role of intellectual property and electronic commerce laws; Extent of the growth of the industry. INSET: A Dearth in Debai.

  • Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights and Product versus Process Innovations. Vishwasrao, Sharmila // Atlantic Economic Journal;Dec99, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p444 

    The incentives of southern governments to protect process and product patents are examined in a game with endogenous research and development and licensing. Patent protection results in the licensing of cost-reducing process innovations to southern firms. By increasing competition, licensing...

  • Some thoughts on the implications of trusted systems for... Gimbel, Mark // Stanford Law Review;May98, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p1671 

    Explores the implications of emerging technologies for intellectual property law. Conventional tale about the vulnerability of digital content; Overview of the trusted systems; Conclusion.

  • Intellectual property is a key revenue builder.  // Knowledge Management;Feb2001, p4 

    Examines the factors influencing intellectual property (IP) decisions by information technology companies. IP management strategies; Value of ideas and innovation over tangible assets.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics