Inclusiveness in the face of anticipated disagreement

Goldberg, Sanford
April 2013
Synthese;Apr2013, Vol. 190 Issue 7, p1189
Academic Journal
This paper discusses the epistemic outcomes of following a belief-forming policy of inclusiveness under conditions in which one anticipates systematic disagreement with one's interlocutors. These cases highlight the possibility of distinctly epistemic costs of inclusiveness, in the form of lost knowledge of or a diminishment in one's rational confidence in a proposition. It is somewhat controversial whether following a policy of inclusiveness under such circumstances will have such costs; this will depend in part on the correct account of the epistemic significance of disagreement (a topic over which there is some disagreement). After discussing this matter at some length, I conclude, tentatively, that inclusiveness under disagreement can have such epistemic costs. Still, I go on to argue, such costs by themselves would not rationalize substantial limitations on a broad policy of inclusiveness. Insofar as there are grounds for restricting how inclusive one should be in belief-formation, these grounds will not be epistemic, but instead will reflect the practical costs-the time, effort, and resource costs to the subject-of following such a policy.


Related Articles

  • A Non-Inferentialist, Anti-Realistic Conception of Logical Truth and Falsity. Wansing, Heinrich // Topoi;Apr2012, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p93 

    Anti-realistic conceptions of truth and falsity are usually epistemic or inferentialist. Truth is regarded as knowability, or provability, or warranted assertability, and the falsity of a statement or formula is identified with the truth of its negation. In this paper, a non-inferentialist but...

  • A Problem for Pritchard's Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. Carter, J. // Erkenntnis;Apr2013, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p253 

    Duncan Pritchard has, in the years following his () defence of a safety-based account of knowledge in Epistemic Luck, abjured his () view that knowledge can be analysed exclusively in terms of a modal safety condition. He has since (Pritchard in Synthese 158:277-297, ; J Philosophic Res...

  • GOD AND EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY. MOSER, PAUL K. // Journal for Cultural & Religious Theory;Spring2015, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p414 

    The article presents the author's views on God and epistemic authority. He explores human beings' fabrication of gods for various reasons which include to reflect their imperfect traits. God's epistemic authority is discussed as well as how it can benefit an epistemiology of people's...

  • The procedural epistemic value of deliberation. Peter, Fabienne // Synthese;Apr2013, Vol. 190 Issue 7, p1253 

    Collective deliberation is fuelled by disagreements and its epistemic value depends, inter alia, on how the participants respond to each other in disagreements. I use this accountability thesis to argue that deliberation may be valued not just instrumentally but also for its procedural features....

  • On nonindexical contextualism. Davis, Wayne // Philosophical Studies;Mar2013, Vol. 163 Issue 2, p561 

    MacFarlane distinguishes 'context sensitivity' from 'indexicality,' and argues that 'nonindexical contextualism' has significant advantages over the standard indexical form. MacFarlane's substantive thesis is that the extension of an expression may depend on an epistemic standard variable even...

  • Generalized Conditionalization and the Sleeping Beauty Problem. Horgan, Terry; Mahtani, Anna // Erkenntnis;Apr2013, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p333 

    We present a new argument for the claim that in the Sleeping Beauty problem, the probability that the coin comes up heads is 1/3. Our argument depends on a principle for the updating of probabilities that we call 'generalized conditionalization', and on a species of generalized...

  • Knowledge and conviction. Anderson, David // Synthese;Jul2012, Vol. 187 Issue 2, p377 

    Much philosophical effort has been exerted over problems having to do with the correct analysis and application of the concept of epistemic justification. While I do not wish to dispute the central place of this problem in contemporary epistemology, it seems to me that there is a general neglect...

  • Embedding Epistemic Modals. Dorr, Cian; Hawthorne, John // Mind;Oct2013, Vol. 122 Issue 488, p867 

    Seth Yalcin has pointed out some puzzling facts about the behaviour of epistemic modals in certain embedded contexts. For example, conditionals that begin ‘If it is raining and it might not be raining, … ’ sound unacceptable, unlike conditionals that begin ‘If it is...

  • What difference might and may make. Nuffer, Gerhard // Synthese;Feb2015, Vol. 192 Issue 2, p405 

    How does your information change when you learn that something might be the case, where the modal 'might' is epistemic? On the orthodox view, a proposition is added to your information base; on the view defended here, no propositions are added to your information base but some are removed from...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics