TITLE

Logics of Action, Provisioning Domains, and Institutions: Provisioning Institutional Logics

AUTHOR(S)
Dequech, David
PUB. DATE
March 2013
SOURCE
Journal of Economic Issues (M.E. Sharpe Inc.);Mar2013, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p95
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article proposes a synthetic new concept of logics of action, intending to apply it to the market, the family, and the polity (inclusive of the state and the community) as crucial instances of what may be termed provisioning domains. These are the broadest or most general domains in which economic activities take place. This article defines a logic of action as a set of socially shared rules of thought and behavior (i.e., socially shared mental models and behavioral rules) that involve a domain of action, the metric used, and the objectives or obligations associated with the positions people occupy in this domain. The domain by itself does not suffice to characterize a logic, and it has to be combined with the other two aspects. The article further discusses the relation between logics of action and institutions, arguing that logics of action are institutions with specific characteristics. They are conceived in relation to very broad provisioning domains and, as such, they have a high degree of generality. The market, the family, and the civic logics may be called provisioning institutional logics, but important differences do exist between the proposed concept herein and some treatments of institutional logics.
ACCESSION #
86405932

 

Related Articles

  • Analysis of Primary School Students' Mental Models Relating to The Structure of Atom. KARAGÖZ, Özden; SAĞLAM ARSLAN, Ayşegül // Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED);Mar2012, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p143 

    The article presents a study that aims to define and describe the mental models of 7th grade primary school students on the concept of atom in Turkey. It states that 45 students from Istanbul were included in the study wherein success test that consists of six open-ended questions was developed...

  • THE FIRST RULE OF STOIC LOGIC AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE INDEMONSTRABLES. López-Astorga, Miguel // Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía;ene-jun2016, Issue 50, p9 

    In addition to the indemonstrables, Stoic logic included a number of reduction rules. In this paper, I analyze the first one of such rules in order to prove whether it was formally derived from the indemonstrables or the Stoics could raise it from the use of their natural reasoning abilities....

  • Preface. MAGNANI, LORENZO; CASADIO, CLAUDIA // Logic Journal of the IGPL;Aug2016, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p453 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editors discuss topics within the issue including the problem of model-based reasoning in technology, abduction reasoning in science, and mental modeling in scientific discovery.

  • Reasoning with conditionals. Guy Politzer // Topoi;Mar2007, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p79 

    This paper reviews the psychological investigation of reasoning with conditionals, putting an emphasis on recent work. In the first part, a few methodological remarks are presented. In the second part, the main theories of deductive reasoning (mental rules, mental models, and the probabilistic...

  • Could it be the Case that if I am Right My Opponents will be Pleased? A Rejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto. Politzer, Guy // Topoi;Mar2009, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p81 

    I take up the four issues considered by Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto in their reply to Politzer (). Based on the conceptual clarification which they adduce, it seems that the disagreement can be settled about the first one (truth functionality) and can be attenuated about the second one (the...

  • How our brains reason logically. Markus Knauff // Topoi;Mar2007, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p19 

      The aim of this article is to strengthen links between cognitive brain research and formal logic. The work covers three fundamental sorts of logical inferences: reasoning in the propositional calculus, i.e. inferences with the conditional “if...then�,...

  • Disjunctive ifiusory inferences and how to eliminate them. Khemlani, Sangeet; Johnson-Laird, P. N. // Memory & Cognition;Jul2009, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p615 

    The mental model theory of reasoning postulates that individuals construct mental models of the possibilities in which the premises of an inference hold and that these models represent what is true but not what is false. An unexpected consequence of this assumption is that certain premises...

  • Causal Selection and Counterfactual Reasoning. JIMÉNEZ-LEAL, WILLIAM // Revista Colombiana de Psicología;ene-jun2013, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    In this paper I defend the view that counterfactual thinking depends on our causal representation of the world, and in this sense, I argue that causal and counterfactual reasoning are tightly linked. I offer some criticisms and experimental evidence against Mandel's judgement dissociation theory...

  • The Theory of the Formal Discipline and the Possible Interpretations of Conditionals: Material Versus Defective Conditionals. Astorga, Miguel López // Abstracta;2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p31 

    Attridge and Inglis try to check whether or not the 'Theory of Formal Discipline' is correct. This theory states that learning mathematics improves logical reasoning, and Attridge and Inglis review it by means of an experiment. Their conclusion is that, indeed, learning mathematics improves...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics