TITLE

No More Sharing

AUTHOR(S)
Shields, Yvette
PUB. DATE
January 2002
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;
SOURCE TYPE
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on controversies regarding Wisconsin governor Scott McCallum's plan for ending state aid to local governments through the shared revenue program. Overview of the McCallum's proposed budget adjustment plan; Possible measures made for eliminating shared revenue program by 2004.
ACCESSION #
8637173

 

Related Articles

  • The Construction of Revenue Sharing Formulae. Stutzer, Michael J. // Southern Economic Journal;Apr82, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p1036 

    In earlier contributions to this journal, Plummer [5], Goetz [2], and Johnson [4] have analyzed the incentives certain revenue sharing formulae with tax effort factors create for higher recipient government tax levels. The specific formulae examined by them have the following properties: 1. The...

  • Chicago Fed: State Policy Drove Michigan Locals to Fiscal Crisis. Devitt, Caitlin // Bond Buyer;10/31/2014, Vol. 1 Issue F342, p30 

    The article discusses a 2014 report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on the trends in state revenue sharing to local governments (LG) in Michigan. Topics covered in the report include the state aid cuts experienced by local LG since 2003, the pressure brought by the economic downturns on...

  • Report: Proposed Bush Cuts Would Hurt Budgets, Programs. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;5/30/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32391, p5 

    The article reports that the U.S. government has proposed a budget for fiscal 2007 that would substantially cut federal aid to state and local governments. It will potentially hurt their finances. It was revealed by a report issued by the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government. Federal...

  • AID, EXPENDITURES, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE. Weicher, John C. // National Tax Journal;Dec72, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p573 

    Recent theoretical and empirical work on the relationship between aid and expenditures has failed to take account of the vast differences in the structure of local government between states. This study investigates the effect that aid given to one local government (e.g., the city) has on...

  • General-Purpose Aid in New York State: Targeting Issues and Measures. Moore, Paul D. // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Spring89, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p17 

    This article explores key questions about targeted versus distributive aid policies within the context of New York's general-purpose state aid program. Development of that program over the past forty years shows ebbs and flows of support for both targeted and distributive approaches. Intense...

  • Revenue Sharing. Savage, David G. // Education Digest;Oct1979, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p62 

    This article presents information on a report issued jointly by the U.S. Department of Commerce and Department of Treasury, according to which, federal revenue sharing pumps about $1.2 billion a year into state and local education programs. In 1977, states got $2.3 billion in revenue sharing to...

  • Michigan Lawmakers Overturn Veto of Revenue-Sharing Funds. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;8/15/2002, Vol. 341 Issue 31450, p33 

    Reports the lawmakers disapproval on the veto of governor John Engler for the revenue-sharing funds in Michigan. Need for the approval of the ballot initiatives; Maintenance of the fiscal health; Relief of the local governments on the restoration of the funding.

  • Angry Council Calls For Override Of Engler Veto. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;8/5/2002, Vol. 20 Issue 31, p7 

    Reports on the negative reactions of Grand Rapids local officials on the decision of Michigan governor John Engler to eliminate $845 million in statutory revenue sharing funds. Call for state lawmakers to override the governor's veto; Allegation that the veto violated a partnership that state...

  • More revenues sharing means more broken promises. Kurk, Neal M. // New Hampshire Business Review;10/29/93, Vol. 15 Issue 20, p22 

    Opinion. Comments on the revenue sharing between New Hampshire's state government and its municipalities. Reduction of the municipalities' share of state tax revenues as a result of broken state promises; Increases in meals and rooms revenues for municipalities by 1996; Decline in loophole...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics