Doyle, Charles
January 2012
International Journal of Ethics;2012, Vol. 8 Issue 1/2, p95
Academic Journal
In some jurisdictions, it is unethical for an attorney to secretly record a conversation even though it is not illegal to do so. A few states require the consent of all parties to a conversation before it may be recorded. Recording without mutual consent is both illegal and unethical in those jurisdictions. Elsewhere the matter is more uncertain. In 1974, the American Bar Association (ABA) opined that surreptitiously recording a conversation without the knowledge or consent of all of the participants violated the ethical prohibition against engaging in conduct involving "dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation." The ABA conceded, however, that law enforcement recording, conducted under judicial supervision, might breach no ethical standard. Reaction among the authorities responsible for regulation of the practice of law in the various states was mixed. In 2001, the ABA reversed its earlier opinion and announced that it no longer considered oneparty consent recording per se unethical when it is otherwise lawful. Today, this is the view of a majority of the jurisdictions on record. A substantial number, however, disagree. An even greater number have yet to announce an opinion. A sampling of the views of various bar associations in the question is attached. An earlier version of this report once appeared under the same title as CRS Report 98-250. An abridged version of this report is available without footnotes or attachment as CRS Report R42649, Wiretapping, Tape Recorders, and Legal Ethics: An Abridged Overview of Questions Posed by Attorney Involvement in Secretly Recording Conversation.


Related Articles

  • Talking Points. PODGERS, JAMES // ABA Journal;May2011, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p16 

    The article offers information on the American Bar Association (ABA) Commission's initiative to seek views on legal ethics. It is stated that the commission is seeking input on the issues, alternative business structures and cross-border practice, as it looks at how lawyer ethics and regulations...

  • Smooth Sailing in Big D. PODGERS, JAMES; WEISS, EBRA CASSENS // ABA Journal;Apr2013, Vol. 99 Issue 4, p58 

    The article presents information on the Ethics 20/20 Commission, which has been working since 2009 to revise the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct and related ethics standards related to law practice in the U.S. The Commission has proposed that lawyers from...

  • Seven Tips to Keep Client Solicitations Ethical. Downey, Michael // Law Practice: The Business of Practicing Law;Mar/Apr2015, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p18 

    The article offers tips to lawyers to understand law governing client solicitation in the U.S. which interpret the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. As significant variations exist between the Model Rules and some state rules, lawyers should consult their own states' regulations. An...

  • HOW TO CONDUCT YOURSELF IN COURT. Sanchez, Benjamin K. // GPSolo;Nov/Dec2016, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p78 

    The article reflects upon the code of conduct for the lawyers that has to be maintained inside a court. Topics include being honest as per the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct modeled after American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct, being reasonable, and presenting fair...

  • New Ethics Code. Quade, Vicki // American Bar Association Journal;Oct83, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p1365 

    Reports on the American Bar Association's adoption of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Impact of the adoption of the ethics code; Inclusions of the ethics code; Implications on lawyers and the practice of law.

  • ABA delegates call for rule to prohibit pay-to-play. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;08/05/98, Vol. 325 Issue 30450, p1 

    Reports on the American Bar Association delegates' (ABA) adoption of a resolution calling for an ABA rule that would prohibit lawyers from making political contributions to state or local officials in return for work eligibility. Local government's need to adopt tough prescriptive rules that...

  • House of Delegates: Close vote rescinds provision against ancillary business. DeBenedictis, Don J. // ABA Journal;Oct92, Vol. 78 Issue 10, p110 

    Reports on the American Bar Association House of Delegates' vote in August 1992 that rescinded a professional responsibility provision restricting lawyers' rights to operate businesses ancillary to their law practice in the United States. Key requirements of the proposed rule; Arguments of...

  • House OKs Revised Ethics Rules Format. Winter, Bill // American Bar Association Journal;Mar1982, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p255 

    Reports on the American Bar Association (ABA) House of Delegates' approval of a revised format for the proposed Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Drafting of the rules by the ABA Commission on Evaluation of Professional Standards; Debate about the alleged misuse of ethical considerations by...

  • Beg Your Pardon. Reich, Elaine // ABA Journal;Oct89, Vol. 75 Issue 10, p120 

    Discusses ethics standards governing lawyer conduct. Provisions under the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct who provide guidance to a lawyer who committed negligence; Massachusetts Bar Association's decision that a defendant in a malpractice action filed by a...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics