TITLE

How Much Does the Market Value an Improvement in a Product Attribute?

AUTHOR(S)
Ofek, Elie; Srinivasan, V.
PUB. DATE
September 2002
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Fall2002, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p398
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
A firm contemplating improvements to its product attributes would be interested in the dollar value the market attaches to any potential product modification. In this paper, we derive a measure of market value such that the comparison of the measure against the incremental unit cost of the attribute improvement is key in deciding whether or not the attribute improvement is profitable. Competition from other brands, the potential for market expansion, and heterogeneity in customer preference structures are explicitly modeled using the multinomial logit framework. The analysis yields a closed form expression for the market's value for an attribute improvement (MVAI). A key result we obtain is that customers should be differentially weighted based on their probability of purchasing the firm's product. In particular, customers who exhibit a very high or very low probability of choosing the firm's product should receive less weight in determining MVAI. Because the probability of choice varies across products, the answer to the question of how much the market values an improvement depends on which firm is asking the question. It is shown that customers whose utilities have a greater random component should be weighted less. Furthermore, the measure developed is robust to the influence of outliers in the sample. An empirical illustration of the MVAI measure in the context of a new product development study is provided. The study illustrates the advantages of the proposed measure over currently used approaches and explores the possibility of competitive price reactions.
ACCESSION #
8604782

 

Related Articles

  • Revisiting "What's Wrong…" Gibson, Larry; Marder, Eric // Marketing Research;Winter2002, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p47 

    Presents a reply to a comment made on an article on conjoint analysis. Implications of the limited capacity of the conjoint analysis family of research methods; Argument for the use of conjoint analysis.

  • HIERARCHICAL MODEL TESTING IN CONJOINT ANALYSIS. Carroll, J. Douglas; Green, Paul E.; DeSarbo, Wayne S. // Advances in Consumer Research;1980, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p688 

    Increasingly, researchers are becoming interested in the relationship of part-worth functions, obtained from conjoint analysis, to other aspects of the respondents (e.g., their demographics, preferences for current brands, etc.). This paper describes a straight-forward procedure for determining...

  • Probabilistic Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Theory and Application. Toubia, Olivier; Hauser, John; Garcia, Rosanna // Marketing Science;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p596 

    Polyhedral methods for choice-based conjoint analysis provide a means to adapt choice-based questions at the individual-respondent level and provide an alternative means to estimate partworths when there are relatively few questions per respondent, as in a Web-based questionnaire. However, these...

  • CONJOINT ANALYSIS RELIABILITY: EMPIRICAL FINDINGS. Reibstein, David; Bateson, John E. G.; Boulding, William // Marketing Science;Summer88, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p271 

    This paper looks at the comparative reliability of different methodological variants of the conjoint analysis procedure. It differs from previous studies in that it looks at three methods of data collection (Full Profile, Trade-off Matrices, and Paired Comparison) and two levels of a key...

  • Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research. Bodog, Simona Aurelia; Florian, Gyula Laszlo // Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering;May2012, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p19 

    In today's competitive business environment unrealized gains erode profits because sellers cannot adequately determine what customers are willing to pay for product features. Companies cannot capture their markets randomly nor can the product managers develop haphazard product decisions....

  • USING MAIL SURVEY FOR CONJOINT MEASUREMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE MULTIPLE-FACTOR.... Khera, Inder P.; Karns, David A. // AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings;1983, p137 

    Assesses the alternative multiple-factor instruments using mail surveys for conjoint analysis. Use of conjoint measurement in marketing research; Presentation of realistic alternative multiattribute stimuli to respondents; Evaluation on the internal and external validity of the technique.

  • Multiattribute Judgments Under Uncertainty: A Conjoint Measurement Approach. Basu, Amiya K.; Hastak, Manoj // Advances in Consumer Research;1990, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p554 

    A methodology to predict product choice under uncertainty in attribute values is proposed and tested. The methodology consists of (i) estimating the multiattribute utility function of a consumer, and (ii) predicting new product evaluation based on expected utility computed using äie estimated...

  • Trade-off techniques and marketing issues. Wyner, Gordon A. // Marketing Research;Fall/Winter95, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p32 

    The article focuses on the conjoint analysis and choice modeling as competitive research tools for quantifying trade-offs consumers make among product attributes. Much of the focus has been on the design and methodological differences. Considerable research has been conducted to assess the...

  • A GENERAL APPROACH TO PRODUCT DESIGN OPTIMIZATION VIA CONJOINT ANALYSIS. Green, Paul E.; Carroll, J. Douglas; Goldberg, Stephen M. // Journal of Marketing;Summer81, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p17 

    This paper describes some of the features of POSSE (Product Optimization and Selected Segment Evaluation), a general procedure for optimizing product/service designs in marketing research. The approach uses input data based on conjoint analysis methods. The output of consumer choice simulators...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics