TITLE

Powers Inherent in Sovereignty: Indians, Aliens, Territories, and the Nineteenth Century Origins of Plenary Power over Foreign Affairs

AUTHOR(S)
Cleveland, Sarah H.
PUB. DATE
November 2002
SOURCE
Texas Law Review;Nov2002, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the historical origins of the doctrine of inherent powers of the U.S. government over foreign affairs and its ratification by the Supreme Court's decision concerning Indians, aliens and territories in the 19th century. Concept of sovereignty; Scope of Constitution; Discussion on Indians and Sovereignty under international law; Law and court cases on immigration; Authority over the territories.
ACCESSION #
8596517

 

Related Articles

  • Conquering the cultural frontier: The new subjectivism of the Supreme Court in Indian Law. Getches, David H. // California Law Review;Dec96, Vol. 84 Issue 6, p1573 

    Discusses the subjectivist approach of the US Supreme Court in dealing with Indian jurisdictional situations. District legal rights in treaties and other laws held by Indian tribes; perpetuation of culture and land base through governance; Dependence of the court majorities on Justice's...

  • Justice for Immigrants.  // Christian Science Monitor;7/5/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 154, p8 

    Discusses the policies of the United States government and Supreme Court concerning immigration to the U.S.

  • Courting Trouble. Gibeaut, John // ABA Journal;Mar2000, Vol. 86 Issue 3, p68 

    Provides information on the tribal courts of the United States (US). Justice system of American Indians centuries before Columbus arrived; Assessment on the jurisdiction and financial support for tribal courts; Restriction on the power and jurisdiction of tribal courts by the US Supreme Court...

  • Congressional Intent, Practical Reasoning, and the Dynamic Nature of Federal Indian Law. Frickey, Philip P. // California Law Review;Oct90, Vol. 78 Issue 5, p1137 

    Federal' Indian law is a little understood, almost mysterious corner of public law. One major reason is that the Supreme Court has accorded Congress plenary power over Indian affairs. Taken to its logical conclusion, this doctrine would require the Court to follow congressional intent in...

  • The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interest of M.H.,L.U.H.,W. H. Jr, L.S.H. and T.H., minor children.  // Native American Law Digest;Feb2005, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p10 

    This article focuses on the reversal of decision by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the termination of the parental rights of a father and mother in a case where the children were American Indian. Testimony at trials indicated that all the children thrived in foster care were being exposed to...

  • American Indians in Court: The Burger and Rehnquist Years. Hermann, John R. // Social Science Journal;2000, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p245 

    Examines the treatment of American Indian interests in the United States Supreme Court during the Burger and Rehnquist Courts. Factors influencing the courts' decision-making; Comparison of the treatments given by various courts; Similarity of justices' support rates of to American Indians with...

  • POLITICAL INSIDERS POLL. Barnes, James A.; Bell, Peter // National Journal;9/3/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 36, p2627 

    Presents the results of a poll conducted by the "National Journal" on various issues in U.S. politics in 2005. Possible effects of the U.S. Supreme Court's plan to overturn the Roe versus Wade case on U.S. Republicans and Democrats; Benefits of the passage of immigration-law changes that...

  • National Spotlight.  // Political Intelligence Briefing;7/9/2012, p1 

    The article reports on the political condition in the U.S. It notes that the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) has upheld the health care program of U.S. President Barack Obama. It cites that SCOTUS has strike down the immigration law of Arizona. It adds that Obama has ended the deportation of...

  • United States of America vs. State of Washington.  // Native American Law Digest;Feb2005, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p9 

    This article focuses on the reversal of the U.S. District Court's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court related to the lawsuit "United States of America vs. State of Washington." The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the U.S. District Court's decision denying the Samish tribes, motion to reopen a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics