Golanski, Alani
August 2002
Albany Law Review;2002, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p61
Academic Journal
Questions the link between linguistics and statutory construction as perceived by legal scholars. Background on Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories; Principles of statutory interpretation; Assessment of Cunningham/Levi's analyses of Staples and Granderson cases.


Related Articles

  • Statutes with Multiple Personality Disorders: The Value of Ambiguity in Statutory Design and Interpretation. Grundfest, Joseph A.; Pritchard, A.C. // Stanford Law Review;Apr2002, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p627 

    Determines the value of ambiguity in statutory design and interpretation. Legislative purpose of ambiguity; Analysis of of the motivations of legislators for the use of ambiguity; Details of the legislative history of the strong inference provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform...

  • A Case Study in Statutory Interpretation: Western Union Co. vs. Lenroot. Radin, Max // California Law Review;Jun45, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p219 

    Analyzes aspects of statutory interpretation in the Western Union Co. v. Lenroot U.S. Supreme Court case. Views of lawyers of statutory interpretation; Issues in the employment of minors at Western Union; Usage of intention in a related assertion.

  • German judge open can of homophobia.  // Body Politic;Dec82, Issue 89, p16 

    Reports that a case filed by a gay man to recover the money he spent for his ex-lover has exposed homophobia in the interpretation of the law in West Germany, according to the September 1982 issue of the German magazine "Torso." Background on the argument between the gay men; Ruling of a local...

  • Chapter 4: Of the Interpretation of Laws. Beccaria, Cesare // An Essay On Crimes & Punishments;1983, p22 

    This article discusses the interpretation of laws. Judges, in criminal cases, have no right to interpret the penal laws, because they are not legislators. The sovereign, that is, the representative of society, and not the judge, whose office is only to examine, if a man have, or have not...

  • NLRB Issues Lead Case Addressing Supervisory Status In Response To Supreme Court's Decision In Kentucky River.  // Florida Nurse;Dec2006, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p16 

    The article discusses the decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over three cases in the U.S. that have addressed supervisory status of an individual under the National Labor Relations Act. The decisions were based on the judgment of the Supreme Court over "NLRB v. Kentucky River...

  • What's New in European Arbitration? van Houtte, Vera; Wilske, Stephan; Young, Michael // Dispute Resolution Journal;Nov2007-Jan2008, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p12 

    News briefs are offered on developments in European arbitration and award. The House of Lords in Great Britain upheld a decision by the Court of Appeals which gave the broadest possible interpretation of the construction of arbitration agreements. The French Court of Cassation affirmed its...

  • A quién le habla la Corte Constitucional colombiana? El juez y el auditorio universal. Obando, Pedro Antonio García; Román, Javier Orlando Aguirre; Caballero, Mauricio Albarracín // Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas;2009, Issue 110, p77 

    Law can be conceived as the result of a process in which the judge (speaker) must obtain society's adhesion (audience) to which his decisions are addressed. This article argues in favor of this thesis through the application of Perelman theory of argumentation to our legal reality, and...

  • Frederico v. Home Depot: The Third Circuit Clarifies the Removal Burden for CAFA Defendants, But Is the Burden Still Too High? Davis, Dwight J.; Chally, Jonathan R.; McEntyre, Zachary A. // Defense Counsel Journal;Oct2008, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p358 

    The article accounts the history of burden of proof imposed on removing parties both before and after the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) was enacted. It suggests that, based on the history report, the language of CAFA itself, and U.S. Congress's express intent in enacting it, thus...

  • A Framework for Fettering. Knight, C. J. S. // Judicial Review;Mar2009, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p73 

    The article focuses on a framework analysis on the case law on the fettering of discretion among decision-makers. It mentions that the case law on fettering of discretion should be considered in four categories including common law powers, statutory discretion, a policy for the discretion by...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics