TITLE

Understanding and benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals for chronic disease

AUTHOR(S)
Bell, Erica; Seidel, Bastian
PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
BMC Health Services Research;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p343
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Key challenges in benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals in areas such as chronic disease are: 1) developing indicators and understanding how policy goals might work as indicators of service performance; 2) developing methods for economically collecting and reporting stakeholder perceptions; 3) combining and sharing data about the performance of organizations; 4) interpreting outcome measures; 5) obtaining actionable benchmarking information. This study aimed to explore how a new Boolean-based small-N method from the social sciences--Qualitative Comparative Analysis or QCA--could contribute to meeting these internationally shared challenges. Methods: A 'multi-value QCA' (MVQCA) analysis was conducted of data from 24 senior staff at 17 randomly selected services for chronic disease, who provided perceptions of 1) whether government health services were improving their achievement of a set of statewide policy goals for chronic disease and 2) the efficacy of state health office actions in influencing this improvement. The analysis produced summaries of configurations of perceived service improvements. Results: Most respondents observed improvements in most areas but uniformly good improvements across services were not perceived as happening (regardless of whether respondents identified a state health office contribution to that improvement). The sentinel policy goal of using evidence to develop service practice was not achieved at all in four services and appears to be reliant on other kinds of service improvements happening. Conclusions: The QCA method suggested theoretically plausible findings and an approach that with further development could help meet the five benchmarking challenges. In particular, it suggests that achievement of one policy goal may be reliant on achievement of another goal in complex ways that the literature has not yet fully accommodated but which could help prioritize policy goals. The weaknesses of QCA can be found wherever traditional big-N statistical methods are needed and possible, and in its more complex and therefore difficult to empirically validate findings. It should be considered a potentially valuable adjunct method for benchmarking complex health policy goals such as those for chronic disease.
ACCESSION #
85806644

 

Related Articles

  • Solucient 100 Top Hospitals.  // Health Management Technology;May2007, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p10 

    The article offers information on the annual Solucient 100 Top Hospitals National Benchmarks for Success study which revealed that more than half of the winning hospitals are in the Midwest with 30 of them based in Michigan and Ohio. The study looked at clinical outcomes, efficiency, patient...

  • Benchmarking Standards of Care. O'Leary, Jeannie // Journal of Oncology Management;Summer2005, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p62 

    Discusses key issues concerning benchmarking initiatives by the Commission on Cancer to improve standards of medical care in cancer-treatment programs in the U.S. Impact of the benchmarking initiatives on efforts to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality; Accreditation of anti-cancer programs;...

  • Wait-time benchmarks fall short. Comeau, Pauline // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;1/31/2006, Vol. 174 Issue 3, p299 

    This article reports on the limitations of the new wait-time benchmarks announced by the Canadian federal government on December 12, 2005. This announcement fulfils the commitment to establish evidence-based wait-time benchmarks in 5 areas of care that was made in the September 2004...

  • Benchmarking: a useful tool for informing and improving care of the dying? John Ellershaw; Maureen Gambles; Tamsin McGlinchey // Supportive Care in Cancer;Jul2008, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p813 

    Abstract Objective  The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of participating in two benchmarking exercises to assess the care delivered to patients in the dying phase using the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Design  The study uses questionnaire...

  • Strategisches Benchmarking. Bredl, K.; Hüsig, S.; Angele, M.K.; Lüring, C. // Der Orthopäde;Aug2010, Vol. 39 Issue 8, p785 

    Current changes in the health system due to economic restrictions leading to increased competition require the introduction of intelligent management tools in the clinical arena. In a world where change and development are the only constants, flexibility and critical judgment of one’s own...

  • Benchmarking For Better Outcomes. Schwartz, Kove // Podiatry Management;Sep2005, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p141 

    Stresses the importance of benchmarking in podiatric practice. History of benchmarking in podiatry; Benefits of benchmarking quality of care indicators; Comparison between external and internal benchmarking; Guidelines for implementing corrective measures after benchmarking

  • Activity-Based Benchmarking and Process Management--Managing the Case of Cardiac Surgery. Chiang, Bea // Management Accounting Quarterly;Autumn2002, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p21 

    Discusses the significance of benchmarking to health care organizations where the close monitoring of resources is critical to ensure the effectiveness of such organization. Examples of external industry benchmarks that a hospital can use to compare its operation to other health care providers;...

  • THE VALUE OF BENCHMARKING. Solovy, Alden // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;Nov2003, Vol. 77 Issue 11, p36 

    Discusses the value of benchmarking to hospital administration in the U.S. Expansion of quality healthcare initiative for hospital patients; Limitation of online services; Improvement of benchmarking in hospital IT.

  • Six Blind Men and the Elephant. Wang, Binseng // 24x7;Oct2009, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p46 

    The article focuses on the lack of understanding on benchmarking by clinical engineering (CE) professionals and health care executives. It cites the ancient Hindu parable about the six blind men and the elephant. Also discussed is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), a performance management method...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics