TITLE

Urgent memo to the EU: don't let transit be a safe harbour

AUTHOR(S)
De Meyer, Carl; Gommers, Carina
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;May2012, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p346
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Carl De Meyer is a Partner based in the Brussels office of Hoyng Monegier LLP. Carina Gommers is Senior Associate with the same firm and also an Affiliated Junior Researcher at K.U. Leuven.In Philips/Nokia, the ECJ held that goods coming from a non-member state, and declared to customs under a suspensive procedure, can be intercepted by customs when there are indications that the goods may be put on sale in the EU. In the subsequent proceedings on the merits, however, these goods cannot be classified as counterfeit or pirated goods merely on the basis of the fiction that the goods are to be considered as having been manufactured locally.The obvious downside for intellectual property owners is the extremely high burden of proof in the substantive proceedings. Where the mere existence of an indication that the goods may be put on the market in the EU will be enough for customs to suspend release of the goods, an order establishing and enjoining the infringement in the substantive proceedings will require evidence that the goods will effectively be put on the EU market. This requires evidence of an actual sale, an offer for sale or advertising addressed to a consumer in the EU. In most cases, the intellectual property owner will not have the information to meet this burden of proof. The only ones that have the relevant information are the parties interested in the transshipment.We therefore call upon the Commission to provide for a rebuttable presumption in the new Customs Regulation that goods detained by customs, will be assumed to be put on the EU market in violation of the intellectual property right and that the parties interested in the transshipment shall be allowed to rebut that presumption by providing conclusive evidence that the goods are legitimate and have a destination where the intellectual property right shall not be violated.
ACCESSION #
85657456

 

Related Articles

  • ASPECTS CONCERNING COUNTERFEITING AND PIRACY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. GABOR, Simona // Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Seriels VI: M;2012, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p197 

    The global problem of counterfeiting and piracy has increased in European Union though there are special laws defending Intellectual Properties Rights. The aim of this paper is to point out the aspects on the topic of counterfeiting and piracy inside the European Union Single Market. Analysing...

  • 3. MACRO-ACCESSIBILITY IN CHINA: 3.6. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND ENFORCEMENT.  // Solar Photovoltaic Development in China: A Strategic Reference, ;2004, p30 

    The article focuses on the protection and enforcement of intellectual property (IP) in China. As trade and investment increases in the country, counterfeiting and pirating also raises. IP protection and enforcement has remained to be a big challenge, despite of the improvement in legal and...

  • Intellectual Property - No Global Deal.  // Security: Solutions for Enterprise Security Leaders;Apr2010, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p19 

    The article reports on the Anti-Counterfeiting and Trade Agreement's (ACTA) intellectual property negotiation which was opposed by the European Parliament. It mentions that the 27 member countries of the European Union outnumbered the other participating countries including Australia, Canada,...

  • TRAPPED IN CHINA'S SHADOW? INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN POST-WTO-ACCESSION RUSSIA. LANE, WILLIAM P. // Boston College International & Comparative Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p183 

    Russia's December 2011 accession to the World Trade Organization means that it has agreed to implement and enforce intellectual property (IP) laws in accordance with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property. This gives some hope that foreign enterprises, frequently victims...

  • CHINA TRIES TO KICK THE PIRACY HABIT. Roth, Daniel // Fortune;1/10/2005, Vol. 151 Issue 1, p56 

    The article reports on how China's entrepreneurs are asking for protection from intellectual-property thieves. Ben Ye is one of China's many rising young stars. At 24, he won the first round of a business-plan competition at Beijing's prestigious Tsinghua University with a proposal for a...

  • Is Copyright on the Wrong Track? Buydens, Mireille // UNESCO Courier;Sep99, Vol. 52 Issue 9, p37 

    Looks at the question on whether copyright is on the wrong track with the proliferation of pirated consumer products in the market. Purpose of intellectual property rights; Actions taken by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to protect industries against piracy and...

  • Intellectual Property: Initial Observations on the STOP Initiative and U.S. Border Efforts to Reduce Piracy: GAO-06-1004T.  // GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1 

    U.S. goods are subject to substantial counterfeiting and piracy, creating health and safety hazards for consumers, damaging victimized companies, and threatening the U.S. economy. In 2004, the Bush administration launched the Strategy for Targeting Organized Piracy (STOP)--a multi-agency...

  • ASIA & MIDDLE EAST. Lazell, Mark // ICIS Chemical Business;3/20/2006, Vol. 1 Issue 11, p14 

    This article reports on a threat by the U.S. to reassess its trade relations with China because of continuing Chinese counterfeiting, piracy and other barriers to businesses in the U.S., as of March 2006. In the latest of a series of escalating warnings by the U.S. to China about its failure to...

  • Belgium : Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Customs authorities detain nearly 36 million fake goods at EU borders in 2013.  // TendersInfo News;8/1/2014, p1 

    The article reports on data from the European Commission's annual report on customs actions to enforce intellectual property rights (IPR) which show that customs authorities in the European Union detained almost 36 million items suspected of violating IPR in 2013.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics