TITLE

Recent Changes in Intellectual Property Law - Part II

PUB. DATE
February 2013
SOURCE
TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning;Feb2013, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Para
ACCESSION #
85400227

 

Related Articles

  • MICROSOFT CORP. V. AT&T: A WELCOME RETURN TO PATENT LAW'S TRADITION OF TERRITORIALITY. Fernandes, Sean // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2008 Annual Review, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p75 

    The article explains the Supreme Court's decision in Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. and the larger legal landscape of territoriality in U.S. law. In this case, the Court held that 35 U.S.C. Section 271(f) warrants a narrow interpretation and that U.S. exporters of software master disks are not...

  • The War Over Information Technology Patents: How Microsoft v. i4i is Reforming the Mobile Entertainment Industry. Rainey, Ian // University of Denver Sports & Entertainment Law Journal;2011, p137 

    The article focuses on the need of improved standard of proof for invalidation of information technology patents, and its impact of the mobile entertainment industry. It explores the case Microsoft v. i4i, and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case. It also discusses the impact of...

  • Judge Robart's Opinion in Motorola vs. Microsoft and the Future of FRAND. Updegrove, Andrew // Standards Today;Jul2013, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p19 

    The article assesses the future of "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND)" in intellectual property policy in the U.S. It references an opinion issued by U.S. Justice James Robert in the patent infringement case Motorola v. Microsoft. Companies are encouraged to agree on a definition...

  • ANTITRUST AND INNOVATION BEFORE THE SHERMAN ACT. KHAN, B. ZORINA // Antitrust Law Journal;Sep2011, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p757 

    No abstract available.

  • DEAL OR NO DEAL? LICENSING NEGOTIATIONS IN STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS. GILBERT, RICHARD J. // Antitrust Law Journal;Sep2011, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p855 

    No abstract available.

  • Senate IP bill dodges patent issues.  // Medical Device Daily;7/28/2008, Vol. 12 Issue 144, p3 

    The article reports on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act of 2008 which was introduced in the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. It is noted that makers of devices who are concerned primarily with patent conflicts may not support the bill because it does not address how the U.S....

  • A guide to US patent challenge procedures under the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act. Petersen, Maxwell J. // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Aug2014, Vol. 9 Issue 8, p669 

    The Leahy–Smith America Invents Act provides various procedures for challenging the validity of U.S. patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Some of the procedures are complex and expensive, and can only be justified when the patent in question places significant business...

  • WHY THE USPTO SHOULD ADOPT A DEFERRED PATENT EXAMINATION SYSTEM. Irimies, David P. // Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law;Spring2010, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p355 

    To date, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has addressed its two main issues - backlog and stretching pendency times - primarily by throwing resources at them. This approach has failed. This paper explores how the adoption of a deferred examination system for all...

  • Software patents up for debate. Hoskins, Michael W. // Indiana Lawyer;10/28/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 17, p6 

    The article focuses on the debate of the case Bilski v. Doll in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in November 9, 2009 that will determine if software could be patended. Accordingly, it notes that case is considered the landmark patent statutory interpretation case, which the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics