Enforcement: Judge Urges Settlement in SEC's Case Against Ough, Rauscher

Hume, Lynn
November 2001
Bond Buyer;11/21/2001, Vol. 338 Issue 31270, p5
Trade Publication
Focuses on a lawsuit regarding Securities and Exchange Commission charges filed by Orange County, California, against the financial company Dain Rauscher Inc. and former bankers Kenneth Ough and Virginia Horler. Settlement urged by District Court judge Gary Taylor; Ough's intentions regarding settlement; Negotiations planned by the parties in a dispute resolution process.


Related Articles

  • Ough to Continue to Fight SEC in Appeal or Trial. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;7/16/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31181, p6 

    Reports on the decision of former Dain Rauscher Inc. banker Kenneth Ough to continue to fight the United States Securities Exchange Commission's (SEC) Orange County, California-based related securities fraud charges. Ough's denial of the charges despite an appeals court decision favoring SEC;...

  • Rauscher, Horler cases put on hold. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;10/14/99, Vol. 330 Issue 30747, p1 

    Reports that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has put on hold the securities fraud lawsuits it filed against former Dain Rauscher Inc. bankers Kenneth D. Ough and Virginia O. Horler, as they were on the verge of settlement. Reason behind the federal agency's decision to put...

  • Rauscher, SEC seek extensions in case. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;03/13/98, Vol. 323 Issue 30350, p5 

    Reports on the deadline for Dain Rauscher Inc. to respond to securities fraud charges filed against it by the US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). Amendments to the SEC's complaints against the company.

  • Rauscher asks court to dismiss SEC charges. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;04/01/98, Vol. 324 Issue 30363, p58 

    Reports that Dain Rauscher Inc. is urging a Phoenix, Arizona federal court to dismiss the US Securities and Exchange Commission's charges against it for alleged yield-burning abuses. Firm's contention that the commission has failed to substantiate the charges against them; Overview on the...

  • Dain Rauscher faults SEC for imposing new markup standards. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;06/29/98, Vol. 324 Issue 30424, p7 

    Asserts that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission should consider writing markup rules instead of trying to retroactively impose new standards on Dain Rauscher Inc. and other municipal dealers. Court case over alleged yield-burning abuses; Securities fraud charges filed against...

  • SEC suggests TBMA is hypocritical over issue of markup standards. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;07/14/98, Vol. 325 Issue 30434, p1 

    Focuses on the yield-burning lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission against Dain Rauscher Inc. Lawsuit as part of the agency's efforts to file enforcement actions against dealers for yield-burning cases; Response to the friend-of-the-court brief filed by The Bond...

  • Judge in Rauscher Case Waits on Scheduling. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;09/16/98, Vol. 325 Issue 30479, p5 

    Reports on United States District Court Judge Roslyn O. Silver's decision to wait for Dain Rauscher Inc.'s response to the amended complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission before setting up a schedule for a trial in the yield-burning case against the company. Complaints against...

  • Dain Rauscher, SEC discuss yield-burning settlement. Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;12/09/98, Vol. 326 Issue 30536, p1 

    Focuses on the efforts of Dain Rauscher Inc. and the Securities and Exchange Commission to explore the possibility of a settlement of the United States agency's yield-burning lawsuit against the firm. Aspects of the precedent-setting court case; Revelation of the settlement talks' existence in...

  • SEC did not prove failure to disclose, say lawyers in Virginia Horler OS case. Marois, Michael B.; Hume, Lynn Stevens // Bond Buyer;12/14/98, Vol. 326 Issue 30539, p3 

    Reports on former Dain Rauscher Inc. financial adviser Virginia Horler's lawyers' contention that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) failed to prove one of its accusations in an enforcement action against Horler. Horler's alleged material omission and misrepresentation in offering...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics