TITLE

A Simple Comparison of Four Physics–Dynamics Coupling Schemes

AUTHOR(S)
Staniforth, Andrew; Wood, Nigel; Côté, Jean
PUB. DATE
December 2002
SOURCE
Monthly Weather Review;Dec2002, Vol. 130 Issue 12, p3129
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Four schemes (referred to here as explicit, implicit, split-implicit, and symmetrized split-implicit) for coupling physics parameterizations to the dynamical core of numerical weather and climate prediction models have been studied in the context of a simplified, canonical model problem. This problem models the dynamics by a representation of the terms responsible for gravitational oscillations and models the physics by both a constant forcing term and a linear damping term, representative of horizontal or vertical diffusion. The schemes have been analyzed in terms of their numerical stability and accuracy. Two of the schemes (the explicit and splitimplicit) have been studied previously in the context of a three-time-level discretization. Those results are confirmed here for a two-time-level discretization. The two other schemes (the implicit and the novel symmetrized split-implicit) are both found to be second-order accurate and unconditionally stable, and both represent improvements over the explicit and split-implicit schemes. The symmetrized split-implicit has the additional advantage over the implicit scheme, for simplicity and computational efficiency, of separating the physics and dynamics steps from each other. The canonical problem considered here is a considerable simplification of any real physics-dynamics coupling, which limits the generality of the conclusions drawn. However, such simplification allows detailed analysis of some important aspects and motivates further work on both broadening and deepening understanding of physics-dynamics coupling issues.
ACCESSION #
8505243

 

Related Articles

  • The impact of ocean–atmosphere coupling on the predictability of boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation. Hye-Mi Kim; In-Sik Kang // Climate Dynamics;Dec2008, Vol. 31 Issue 7/8, p859 

    The impact of ocean–atmosphere coupling on the simulation and prediction of the boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation (ISO) has been investigated by diagnosing 22-year retrospective forecasts using the Seoul National University coupled general circulation model (CGCM) and its...

  • Adaptive Filtering and Prediction of Intraseasonal Oscillations. Mo, Kingtse C. // Monthly Weather Review;Apr2001, Vol. 129 Issue 4, p802 

    Develops a statistical model for monitoring and forecasting convection patterns as represented by outgoing longwave radiation anomalies (OLRA) in the intraseasonal band over the Indian-Pacific and in the pan-American region. Derivation of the singular spectrum analysis (SSA) for the statistical...

  • Summer U.K. Temperature and Its Links to Preceding Eurasian Snow Cover, North Atlantic SSTs, and the NAO. Qian, Budong; Saunders, Mark A. // Journal of Climate;Dec2003, Vol. 16 Issue 24, p4108 

    Motivated by an attempt to predict summer (June–August) U.K. temperatures, the time-lagged correlations between summer U.K. and European temperatures and prior snow cover, North Atlantic sea surface temperatures (SSTs), and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) are examined. The analysis...

  • Modeled Northern Hemisphere Winter Climate Response to Realistic Siberian Snow Anomalies. Gong, Gavin; Entekhabi, Dara; Cohen, Judah // Journal of Climate;Dec2003, Vol. 16 Issue 23, p3917 

    Wintertime Northern Hemisphere climate variability is investigated using large-ensemble (20) numerical GCM simulations. Control simulations with climatological surface (land and ocean) conditions indicate that the Arctic Oscillation (AO) is an internal mode of the Northern Hemisphere atmosphere,...

  • Comparison of the ECMWF Reanalysis with FIRE I Observations: Diurnal Variation of Marine Stratocumulus. Duynkerke, Peter G.; Teixeira, Joao // Journal of Climate;4/1/2001, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p1466 

    ABSTRACT The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA) results for July 1987 are compared with stratocumulus observations for the same period made during the First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Regional Experiment (FIRE). The FIRE I...

  • Climate Predictions with Multimodel Ensembles. Kharin, Viatcheslav V.; Zwiers, Francis W. // Journal of Climate;Apr2002, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p793 

    Several methods of combining individual forecasts from a group of climate models to produce an ensemble forecast are considered. These methods are applied to an ensemble of 500-hPa geopotential height forecasts derived from the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) integrations...

  • Statistical Recalibration of GCM Forecasts over Southern Africa Using Model Output Statistics. Landman, Willem A.; Goddard, Lisa // Journal of Climate;Aug2002, Vol. 15 Issue 15, p2038 

    A technique for producing regional rainfall forecasts for southern Africa is developed that statistically maps or "recalibrates" large-scale circulation features produced by the ECHAM3.6 general circulation model (GCM) to observed regional rainfall for the December-February (DJF) season. The...

  • Assessing the Relative Roles of Initial and Boundary Conditions in Interannual to Decadal Climate Predictability. Collins, Matthew; Allen, Myles R. // Journal of Climate;Nov2002, Vol. 15 Issue 21, p3104 

    The relative importance of initial conditions and boundary conditions in interannual to decadal climate predictability is addressed. A simple framework is developed in which (i) ensembles of climate model simulations with changing external forcing can be measured against climatology to get an...

  • Dynamic Downscaling of Seasonal Climate Predictions over Brazil. Druyan, Leonard M.; Fulakeza, Matthew; Lonergan, Patrick // Journal of Climate;Dec2002, Vol. 15 Issue 23, p3411 

    Climate projections for March-April-May (MAM) 1985 and 1997 made with the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) GCM over South America on a 4° latitude by 5° longitude grid are "downscaled" to 0.5° grid spacing. This is accomplished by interpolating the GCM simulation product...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics