TITLE

Comparing Team Selection and Seeding for the 2011 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament

AUTHOR(S)
Gray, Kathy L.; Schwertman, Neil C.
PUB. DATE
March 2012
SOURCE
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports;Mar2012, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p0
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The men’s NCAA basketball tournament is a popular sporting event often referred to as “March Madness.” Each year the NCAA committee not only selects but also seeds the tournament teams. Invariably there is much discussion about which teams were included and excluded as well as discussion about the seeding of the teams. In this paper, we propose an innovative heuristic measure of team success, and we investigate how well the NCAA committee seeding compares to the computer-based placements by Sagarin and the rating percentage index (RPI). For the 2011 tournament, the NCAA committee selection process performed better than those based solely on the computer methods in determining tournament success.
ACCESSION #
84343591

 

Related Articles

  • Madness Can Be a Sane Choice for Engaging Promotions. WISNER, JIM // Private Label Buyer;Mar2014, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p28 

    The article focuses on advertising and promotion campaign to be offered by various businesses in March 2014 such as the March Madness pool or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Basketball Tournament. Topics discussed include the survey which shows that about 60 percent of...

  • In Texas, a bigger Final Four figures to be even better. Richardson, Steve // Basketball Times;Oct2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p15 

    The article discusses the hosting of the Final Four National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Basketball Tournament at Jerry Jones' Stadium in Dallas, Texas. It expects that the fans will enjoy the amenities that they have never seen in other stadiums. It adds that gourment food will be...

  • New Orleans a success, but Final Four leaves mixed emotions. Benner, Bill // Indianapolis Business Journal;4/9/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p35 

    The article discusses the popularity of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), as the Final Four teams go forward to the semifinals round in New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Insider. DeCourcy, Mike; Fryer, Jenna // Sporting News;02/28/2000, Vol. 224 Issue 9, p26 

    Reports developments in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in the United States as of February 2000. Includes impression of Memphians to the refusal of John Calipari to coach Georgia Tech team; Contribution of Horns team players to team status; Analysis on team ranking of Kent...

  • Brief History. Gregory, Sean // Time;3/22/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 11, p19 

    The article discusses the history of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) Men's Basketball Tournament and the emergence of the term bracketology.

  • March madness indeed! REEVES, MEL // Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder;4/10/2014, Vol. 80 Issue 37, p4 

    The article presents author's views regarding National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball tournament commonly called as March Madness.

  • State of hockey? Caution! FITZGERALD, LARRY // Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder;4/24/2014, Vol. 80 Issue 39, p12 

    The article presents author's views regarding the Men' and Women's NCAA Basketball National Championships.

  • Basketball Madness.  // Scholastic Scope;3/22/2010, Vol. 58 Issue 14, p4 

    The article reports on the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) Division I Basketball Championship in March 2010 in the U.S.

  • Brooklyn's LIU Blackbirds go dancing at the NCAA tournament. EVANS, HOWIE // New York Amsterdam News;3/21/2103, Vol. 104 Issue 12, p41 

    The article lists the results of various matches in the NCAA Division I tournament action in Dayton, Ohio.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics