TITLE

Use and Interpretation of Composite End Points in Orthopaedic Trials

AUTHOR(S)
Busse, Jason W.; Bhandari, Mohit; Ferreira-González, Ignacio; Montori, Victor M.; Guyatt, Gordon H.
PUB. DATE
July 2012
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p65
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Randomized controlled trials in orthopaedics are often underpowered to detect important differences in outcomes. Composite end points (CEPs) hold promise as a strategy to address this issue by combining multiple end points into one measure, thus increasing the observed event rate. The use of CEPs by trialists, however, can be problematic when they include components that vary greatly in importance to patients and when differences in apparent effect between components are large. We present an overview of CEPs with a focus on appropriate design and interpretation of results.
ACCESSION #
84316870

 

Related Articles

  • Participating in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials: What's the Relative Value? Tornetta III, Paul; Pascual, Mandy; Godin, Katelyn; Sprague, Sheila; Bhandari, Mohit // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p107 

    The value of high-quality, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery is becoming well recognized; however, the efforts of investigators participating in RCTs are often under appreciated in areas such as academic merit. Within this manuscript, we discuss...

  • Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? Poolman, Rudolf W.; Struijs, Peter A. A.; Krips, Rover; Sierevelt, Inger N.; Lutz, Kristina H.; Bhandari, Mohit // BMC Medical Research Methodology;2006, Vol. 6, p44 

    Background: The Levels of Evidence Rating System is widely believed to categorize studies by quality, with Level I studies representing the highest quality evidence. We aimed to determine the reporting quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in the most frequently cited general...

  • Automated patient and medication payment method for clinical trials. Yawn, Barbara P.; Madison, Suzanne; Bertram, Susan; Pace, Wilson D.; Fuhlbrigge, Anne; Israel, Elliot; Littlefield, Dawn; Kurland, Margary; Wechsler, Michael E. // Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials;2013, Vol. 5, p23 

    Background: Published reports and studies related to patient compensation for clinical trials focus primarily on the ethical issues related to appropriate amounts to reimburse for patient's time and risk burden. Little has been published regarding the method of payment for patient participation....

  • Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done? Eldridge, Sandra; Kerry, Sally; Torgerson, David J. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;1/2/2010, Vol. 340 Issue 7736, p36 

    The article describes how bias may occur when individual participants are identified or recruited in cluster randomised trials and how it can be avoided. It provides an example of a trial to illustrate how individual patients are not recruited in a restrictive research environment. It suggests...

  • Growing trend for trials of new cancer drugs to stop early. Mayor, Susan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);4/12/2008, Vol. 336 Issue 7648, p793 

    The article focuses on a review of 25 randomized controlled clinical trials of new cancer drugs which was reported in the "Annals of Oncology". The review found that growing numbers of clinical trials of new cancer drugs conducted since 1998 have been stopped prematurely because of the fact that...

  • Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridges. Patterson, Sue; Mairs, Hilary; Borschmann, Rohan // BMC Medical Research Methodology;2011, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p73 

    Background: The pragmatic randomised controlled trial is widely regarded as the gold standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of health care interventions. Successful conduct of trials and generalisation of findings depends upon efficient recruitment of representative samples, which...

  • Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance. Gram, Inger T.; Lund, Eiliv // Journal of Medical Screening;Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p44 

    The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to examine if an adjunct research project to a breast cancer screening programme would affect the high programme attendance. Women residing in the municipality of Tromsø aged 55 years or older, scheduled to receive an invitation letter to...

  • Study to Test Exercise in Heart Failure Patients.  // IDEA Fitness Journal;May2007, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p15 

    This article announces that a randomized clinical trial of exercise training is underway which will involve 83 sites that will test 3,000 people to find out whether exercise is good for hearth failure patients. It says that health and fitness promoters may benefit from this undertaking. Delane...

  • A systematic review of techniques and interventions for improving adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria during enrolment into randomised controlled trials. Simpson, Fiona; Sweetman, Elizabeth A.; Doig, Gordon S. // Trials;2010, Vol. 11, p17 

    Background: Enrolment of patients into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in violation of key inclusion or exclusion criteria, may lead to excess avoidable harm. The purpose of this paper was to systematically identify and review techniques and interventions proven to prevent or avoid...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics