'Big guy-little guy fight'

Robeznieks, Andis
November 2012
Modern Healthcare;11/26/2012, Vol. 42 Issue 48, p8
Trade Publication
The article reports on the antitrust lawsuit filed by four ambulatory surgery centers against two major healthcare systems. The defendants include HCA-HealthOne, Centura Health, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado and the Colorado Ambulatory Surgery Center Association. The plaintiffs, which include Kissing Camels Surgery Center, sought triple an unspecified amount in damages.


Related Articles

  • Georgia system wins court OK to open surgical center. Kutscher, Beth // Modern Healthcare;7/14/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 28, p6 

    The article reports that the Georgia-based WellStar Health System, not-for-profit healthcare provider, wins the four year long legal battle in the Supreme Court of Georgia by getting the certificate of need to open the surgical center at its East Cobb Health Park.

  • Contract standoff continues between competing UPMC and Highmark systems. Hollander, Catherine; Evans, Meianie // Modern Healthcare;4/28/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 17, p9 

    The article offers information on the contract dispute between the Pittsburgh's, Pennsylvania hospital University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and the not-for-profit healthcare company Highmark that will expire in 2014. Topics discussed include development of integrated-delivery systems...

  • S.C. deal continues consolidation wave. Burda, David // Modern Healthcare;2/19/96, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p14 

    Reports on three South Carolina hospital systems that signed an agreement in early-February 1996 that would place control of the systems under a single not-for-profit company. Wave of regional hospital consolidation sweeping across the state; Proposal of the deals following the 1994 passage of...

  • Antitrust wrangle. Texas hospital accused of exclusionary pricing. Carlson, Joe // Modern Healthcare;3/7/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 10, p10 

    The article discusses the proposed settlement between the United Regional Health Care System of Wichita Falls and regulators in the U.S. Justice Department and Texas attorney general's office which would set a seven-year moratorium on exclusionary contract pricing. The government accused the...

  • Deal or no deal? Evans, Melanie // Modern Healthcare;4/25/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 17, p12 

    The article focuses on the rumored merger deal between Highmark and West Penn Allegheny Health System (WPAHS) in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania health care market. According to a Highmark statement, WPAHS is an important element of the local health care system but there is no acquisition deal...

  • Do over in Pennsylvania: Ruling allows West Penn to proceed with lawsuit. Evans, Melanie // Modern Healthcare;12/6/2010, Vol. 40 Issue 49, p16 

    The article reports that the 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the decision of a district judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by West Penn Allegheny Health System against University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and Highmark. The health system accused UPMC and the insurer of conspiring to...

  • UPMC gets in tiff with local newspaper.  // Modern Healthcare;7/6/2015, Vol. 45 Issue 27, p0036 

    The article discusses the decision of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) health system to ban the newspaper "Pittsburgh Post-Gazette" from five of its hospital gift shops in Pennsylvania. Topics covered include how UPMC accused the newspaper of unfairly treating the health...

  • 24-hour surgery centers to get new regulations. Russell, Judi // New Orleans CityBusiness (1994 to 2008);04/06/98, Vol. 18 Issue 40, p4 

    Reports that a law which was passed during 1997 to permit the extension of care at same-day surgery centers has raised the anger of hospitals in New Orleans, Louisiana. Involvement of the state Department of Health and Hospitals in this law; Comments made by a New Orleans doctor on these...

  • Antitrust settlement still possible. Greenwald, Judy // Business Insurance;7/5/93, Vol. 27 Issue 28, p102 

    Cites the lawyers from the defendants and the plaintiffs on the possible settlement of an insurance antitrust suit before the United States Supreme Court. Policy in favor of settling rather than litigating by General Reinsurance Corp., one of the defendants; Recommendation for states to settle...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics