Was Operator's Response Negligence?

Gold, Lessing E.
December 2012
SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Dec2012, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p36
Trade Publication
The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant alarm company due to the damage caused by low-temperature alarm. An exculpatory clause in the contract barred the claim of the plaintiff. The Appellate Court remanded the case to the lower court which held that the summary judgment was not appropriate.


Related Articles

  • In re Interest of Brittany C. vs. Nona M..  // Native American Law Digest;May2005, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p13 

    The article focuses on the court case "Interest of Brittany C. vs. Nona M." The Court of Appeals of Nebraska affirmed a trial court's decision not to transfer jurisdiction over a neglect petition to tribal court in a case where the children had been enrolled in the Oglala Sioux Tribe during the...

  • Relationships -- I. Jacobs, Marvin A. // Elevator World;Jan2010, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p76 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the injured plaintiff, an employee of an air-conditioning company, sued KF-America and other defendants because of an elevator accident. The trial court rejected the analysis of KF-America concerning the liability for non-economic damages. The Court of...

  • Loss Claim.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p283 

    This section reports on the decision of the Court of Appeal on the case Wood Preservation Ltd. versus Prior in Great Britain in 1968.

  • Agent Representation Held Binding; No Damage, No Coverage With Business Risk; Named Insured Can Bring Third Party Action. Harkavy, Jon // Risk Management (00355593);Apr85, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p16 

    This article discusses several court decisions affecting risk managers as of April 1985. The case Darner Motor Sales Inc. vs. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, involved a commercial insured who was mislead about the coverage it was provided by the...

  • Purchase and Sale of Silver.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p280 

    This article discusses a case about the purchase and sale of silver, Chamberlain versus Wisdom at the Court of Appeal in Great Britain in 1968. It was a significant feature of the case that it was not intended that the taxpayer should realize his assets, his house, his government securities, his...

  • Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Physician's Claim for Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Edmonds, John // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Texas Court of Appeals regarding the case Laredo Medical Group v. Lightner. The court decided that the no special relationship exists between a medical group and one of its physician employees in a manner that will impose a duty of good faith and fair...

  • "I Tax Dead People" -- Texas Court of Appeals Holds that Prepaid Funeral Benefits Trusts' Earnings Derived from Out-of-State Investments Are Included in Texas Gross Receipts. Cox, Jeremy; Lyda, Kirk R. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the case Anderson-Clayton Bros. Funeral Home, Inc. v. Stryhorn wherein the 3rd District of the Texas Court of Appeals held that earnings from investments in out-of-state investment are subject to Texas gross receipts for the earned surplus component, if such investments are...

  • No Final Answer. Schiavoni III, Tancred V.; Marden, David // Best's Review;May2008, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p92 

    The article discusses the legal challenges confronting asbestos bankruptcy litigation in the U.S. It notes the lack of a legal framework in the judiciary system to resolve disputes involving asbestos bankruptcies. In addition, it discusses the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals over...

  • No reliance on case rule. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Jul1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1187, p98 

    This article discusses the ruling a British Court of Appeal on the case Vaughan and Others versus Barlow Clowes International (BCI) and Others. Several investors appealed to the Court of Appeal, contending that all investors who contributed to the two portfolios were contributing to common funds...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics