TITLE

SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS/PRIVACY--STAY CALM, DON'T GET HYSTERICAL: A USER'S GUIDE TO ARGUING THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-VIBRATOR STATUTES

AUTHOR(S)
McKenna, Julie
PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
Western New England Law Review;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p211
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the legislation regarding the sales and distribution of sexual devices in Alabama. It informs that the Supreme Court of Alabama has discarded a statute which prohibits the use of sexual devices or any material that stimulates the human genital organs in the state. It discusses several court case related to sexual devices including Griswold v. Connecticut, Eisenstadt v. Baird and Lawrence v. Texas.
ACCESSION #
83541302

 

Related Articles

  • The to Bear Arms?  // Junior Scholastic;3/10/2008, Vol. 110 Issue 14, p6 

    The article focuses on the gun-control case, District of Columbia v. Heller, presented before the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • Payment Under Protest Not Required From La. Refund Claimant.  // Sales & Use Tax Alert;4/1/2013, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p3 

    The article discusses the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court regarding the case "Tin, Inc. v. Washington Parish Sheriff's Office."

  • Court Rules on Contingency Fees for Public Claims. WILLIAMSON, LAUREN // InsideCounsel;Oct2010, Vol. 22 Issue 225, p68 

    The article discusses the court case County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court of Atlantic Richfield wherein the California Supreme Court ruled that private lawyers can represent government bodies in public claims, on a contingency basis.

  • The Supreme Court and You. Brown, Bryan // Junior Scholastic;11/13/2006, Vol. 109 Issue 7, p6 

    The article provides information on two Supreme Court cases Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District #1 and Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Quicken the Big Winner In Supreme Court Case. McDermott, John // Origination News;Jul2012, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p1 

    The article presents information on a court case Freeman v. Quicken Loans decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • Recent Court of Appeal Cases. Ross, Mike // Chartered Accountants Journal;Apr2001, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p42 

    Lists cases before the New Zealand Court of Appeal as of April 2001. Yovich & Sons Ltd. v. Yovich; Cyclone Hardware v. Patience & Nicholson; Apple Fields Ltd. v. Damesh Holdings Ltd.

  • Appeals court mandates mediation to help settle cases sooner.  // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;11/02/98, Vol. 28 Issue 19, p14 

    Reports that a Utah Court of Appeals program that mandates mediation is helping attorneys settle cases sooner and cut back on costs. Alternative to litigation; Consideration and exploration of settlement.

  • Purchase and Sale of Silver.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p280 

    This article discusses a case about the purchase and sale of silver, Chamberlain versus Wisdom at the Court of Appeal in Great Britain in 1968. It was a significant feature of the case that it was not intended that the taxpayer should realize his assets, his house, his government securities, his...

  • CIRCUIT ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Aug2002, Vol. 12 Issue 129, p60 

    Highlights cases in U.S. courts of appeals as of August 2002. Inclusion of the court's decision in the case 'Hallwood Realty Partners LP v. Gotham Partners LP, et al'; Court's decision in the death benefits case 'Swearingen v. Honeywell Inc.'

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics