TITLE

EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN IRAN

AUTHOR(S)
SOLEIMANI-DAMANEH, JAHANGIR; SOLEIMANI-DAMANEH, MAJID; HAMIDI, MEHRZAD
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Makin;Sep2012, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p983
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In many countries, including Iran, Provincial Departments of Physical Education try to develop the athletic sports and sports for all in their related areas (state), using the government resources. Their success rate has always been an important subject for the top sports managers of country. In this paper we use data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques for analyzing the performance of physical education organizations in Iran. Some convex and nonconvex DEA models have been used. Afterwards, we have used the Shannon's entropy for aggregating the results obtained from different models and providing a final efficiency score (FES) and a unified ranking. It can be seen that, in the ranking approach provided in this paper the most productive scale size (MPSS) units have the best rank (see Proposition 1). Our findings reveal that the average of FESs of the states is 0.472635 and 50% of the states have an FES more than this average. Classifying the sates to five efficiency classes, "Excellent, Good, Middle, Weak and Very Weak", the percentage of the states belonging to these classes are 6.7, 30, 16.6, 36.7 and 10, respectively. Also, some correlation and difference studies have been carried out using the Pearson's correlation and student's t-tests. Finally, comparisons between the results of some relevant existing publications and those given in the present paper are addressed.
ACCESSION #
83513355

 

Related Articles

  • An integrated approach based on DEA and AHP. Pakkar, Mohammad // Computational Management Science;Jan2015, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p153 

    This research proposes a theoretical framework to assess the performance of Decision Making Units (DMUs) by integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodologies. According to this, we consider two sets of weights of inputs and outputs under...

  • Cross-Weight Evaluation for Pairwise Comparison Matrices. Wang, Ying-Ming; Luo, Ying; Xu, Yi-Song // Group Decision & Negotiation;May2013, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p483 

    Data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology has recently been applied to weight derivation in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). This paper proposes a cross-weight evaluation technique, which is similar to the cross-efficiency evaluation in DEA, for priority determination in the AHP. The...

  • An integrated design methodology based on the use of group AHP-DEA approach for measuring lean tools efficiency with undesirable output. Anvari, Alireza; Zulkifli, Norzima; Sorooshian, Shahryar; Boyerhassani, Omid // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology;Feb2014, Vol. 70 Issue 9-12, p2169 

    The selection of lean tools is one of the crucial factors for decision makers and practitioners in a competitive environment. A few efforts have been made based on problem selection. Conversely, numerical studies have been done on analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-data envelopment analysis...

  • Research on Partner Selection in Virtual Enterprise Based on AHP and DEA. Songtao Zhang; Haifeng Pang; Zhuangpin Wei // Journal of Convergence Information Technology;Mar2013, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p880 

    Virtual enterprise is the main mode to copy with the highly competitive and fast-changing market environment. As a key step that bears heavily on the success or the failure of virtual enterprise, partner selection process is very complex. In order to solve the issue that the accuracy of...

  • Assessment of coaches using Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Hancong Tang; Yanan Dong // Applied Mechanics & Materials;2014, Vol. 687-691, p1560 

    This paper presents three models as a potential decision making method for selecting the best baseball, field hockey, and women's basketball NCAA Division I coaches. Five indicators, synthesized coaching efficiency, winning percentage, consecutive championship, achievement index and gender, are...

  • Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis. Rakhshan, Seyed; Kamyad, Ali; Effati, Sohrab // Annals of Operations Research;Mar2015, Vol. 226 Issue 1, p505 

    All the basic models in data envelopment analysis (DEA) divide decision making units (DMUs) in two groups: efficient DMUs and inefficient DMUs, and lack of discrimination of efficient units is a serious problem. Also in spite of completely ranking units in analytical hierarchy process (AHP), the...

  • Multiple attribute grey relational analysis using DEA and AHP. Pakkar, Mohammad // Complex & Intelligent Systems;Dec2016, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p243 

    This research proposes an integrated data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach to obtain attribute weights in a grey relational analysis (GRA) method. First, this can be implemented by developing a DEA-based GRA model to obtain attribute weights for the...

  • AN INTEGRATED FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-FUZZY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (FAHP-FDEA) METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT BUILDING ASSESSMENT. Loron, Afshar Sahraei; Loron, Mehrdad Sahraei // Tehnicki vjesnik / Technical Gazette;Mar/Apr2015, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p383 

    In the recent years, organizations and researchers have been focused on the intelligent building assessment in building design and construction. The performance of intelligent buildings (IBs) is measured based on the IB related characteristics and actual circumstances. This paper utilizes the...

  • Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. Jablonsky, Josef // Central European Journal of Operations Research;Sep2012, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p435 

    Data envelopment analysis models usually split decision making units into two basic groups, efficient and inefficient. Efficiency score of inefficient units allows their ranking but efficient units cannot be ranked directly because of their maximum efficiency. That is why there are formulated...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics