TITLE

Peripheral tunnels violate law, public policy and common sense

AUTHOR(S)
JENNINGS, BILL
PUB. DATE
November 2012
SOURCE
California Farmer;Nov2012, Vol. 295 Issue 11, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the violation of laws by the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, the habitat plan which is being used to justify the building of Peripheral Tunnels under the Sacramento River-San Joaquin River Delta in California.
ACCESSION #
83433158

 

Related Articles

  • OPEN SPACES IN TIGHT PLACES: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE. KIBEL, PAUL STANTON; NITTA, KATHLEEN E. // Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal;2012, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1 

    An introduction is presented which discusses various reports within the issue on topics including San Francisco's Crissy Field, restoration of the Ballona Wetlands in southern California, and the Endangered Species Act's Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs).

  • Editor's foreword. Macrory, R // Journal of Environmental Law;1999, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p1 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issues on topics including international public law concerning protection of birds, impact of British environmental law on wildlife and habitat protection, and implementation of environmental law.

  • A Treasured Place. Grandberry, Shawnetta // Endangered Species Bulletin;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p8 

    Focuses on the conservation tool implemented in Coachella Valley in California. Amendments in the 1982 Endangered Species Act to allow for the development and implementation of habitat conservation plans; Creation of the Natural Community Conservation Planning program in California in 1991;...

  • Bill requires cost-benefit study.  // California Farmer;Nov2012, Vol. 295 Issue 11, p32 

    The article provides information on a legislative bill introduced by U.S. Representative John Garamendi, which will require the federal government to study the full costs and benefits of conveyance improvements under review as part of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, a habitat plan.

  • Comparing Perspective of Participants and Outside Commentators on Habitat Conservation Plans. Opperman, Jeff J.; Bernazzani, Paola // Endangered Species Update;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p79 

    Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) have become the primary mechanism by which the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is implemented on private land. Due to the dramatic increase in the number and size of plans, numerous scientists, conservation organizations, and other outside commentators have...

  • Acts Approved by the President.  // Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents;11/29/99, Vol. 35 Issue 47, p2450 

    Presents a list of the legislative acts approved by U.S. President Bill Clinton as of November 18, 1999. Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999; Arctic Tundra Habitat Emergency Conservation Act; Technical Corrections to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999.

  • Habitat protection: has the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 made a difference? Last, KV // Journal of Environmental Law;1999, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p15 

    This article aims to ascertain the impact of the UK habitat protection system. This was one of the earliest examples in the environmental field of a regime which relies heavily on voluntary agreements coupled with financial incentives to achieve its objectives. The problems associated with the...

  • LOUISIANA VS BUSH.  // Ecologist;Jun2001, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p11 

    Reports that a federal appeals court in Louisiana has overturned a regulation in the United States (U.S.) concerning `critical habitat' areas for the protection of endangered species. Definition of `critical habitat' areas; Reasons behind the decision of the appeals court to overturn the...

  • The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive. Krämer, Ludwig // Journal of Environmental Law;2009, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p59 

    The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics