Lewis v. ALexAnder ViNdiCates PrimaCy of federal law of sPeCial Needs trusts

Landsman, Ron M.
October 2012
NAELA Journal;Oct2012, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p233
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Special Needs Trust Planning. Webb Jr., Ronnie E. // GPSolo;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p34 

    The article offers information on three types of special needs trusts, which are, first-party special needs trusts, pooled special needs trusts, and third-party special needs trusts. A first-party special needs trust, or (d)(4)(A) trust, is an irrevocable trust created pursuant to federal law as...

  • Case Law Developments for December 2012. Schaefer, Susan Peters // ESOP Report;Dec2012, p4 

    The article discusses case law developments in the U.S. for December 2012. The Federal District Court in Florida declined to dismiss a claim for contribution or indemnity brought by one plan fiduciary against another plan fiduciary in Guididas v. Community National Bank Corp. In Churchill, Ltd....

  • Supplemental needs trusts offer planning options for the disabled. Lamson, Carole C. // CPA Journal;Aug98, Vol. 68 Issue 8, p64 

    Discusses the planning options for the disabled offered by supplemental needs trusts in the United States. Purpose of supplemental needs trust; Protection of assets and eligibility for Medicaid; Fist-party trusts for the disabled under federal and New York State laws.

  • Browser. Keeffe, Arthur John // American Bar Association Journal;Nov83, Vol. 69 Issue 11, p1777 

    Focuses on issues concerning the practice of law in the U.S. Symposium on the law of decedents' estates and trusts dedicated to William F. Fratcher; Gap between the Veterans Benefit Act and the Federal Tort Claims Act; Laws to protect tenants in the rental apartments being converted to...

  • REINVENTING PATENT LAW. Seidenberg, Steve // ABA Journal;Feb2008, Vol. 94 Issue 2, p58 

    In this article, the author describes the implementation of patent laws in the U.S. The author references the patent case State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group Inc. decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1998. He observes that both individuals and...

  • ANTITRUST AND BUSINESS LITIGATION. McAtee II, David R.; Westridge, Emily W. // Texas Bar Journal;Jan2011, Vol. 74 Issue 1, p18 

    The article discusses the amendments proposed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the anti-trust law guidelines and federal rules regarding crime known as "theft of honest services." It analyzes the impact of the proposed amendments in the antitrust and business litigation section of the State Bar of...

  • Future Federal Regulation of Business.  // Vital Speeches of the Day;2/1/37, Vol. 3 Issue 8, p238 

    Presents a speech by co-author of the National Industrial Recovery Act Donald R. Richberg, given at a meeting of Ohio State Bar Association in January 1937, on the issue of federal regulation of business. Discussion on anti-trust laws and suggestions for their revision; Limitations of the...

  • United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation: Its Importance and Potential Future Ramifications. ANN KRONK, ELIZABETH // Federal Lawyer;Apr2014, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p4 

    The article focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation case on Indian country, for which the Federal Bar Associations Indian Law Section has submitted an amicus brief to the court. Topics discussed include role of the federal...

  • Hackney seeks meeting of minds on children's rights. Parker, Jon // Lawyer;1/8/2007, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p6 

    The article reports on the proposal of Hackney Learning Trust head of law and company secretary Tom Lewis-Brooke for a multidisciplinary initiative to head off judicial reviews of decisions over children's services. Lewis-Brooke and Doreen Forrester-Brown, principal lawyer for children and...

  • Using the New Equal Protection to Challenge Federal Control over Tribal Lands. Skibine, Alex T. // Public Land & Resources Law Review;2015, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p3 

    The article challenges the U.S. Supreme Court's equal protection jurisprudence related to Indian legislation and protection of Indians from laws enacted to their disadvantage in different cases such as United States v. Windsor, Romer v. Evans and Morton v. Mancari. Topics discussed include of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics