TITLE

Management office refutes residents' claim

PUB. DATE
October 2012
SOURCE
Malay Mail;10/24/2012, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the management office accused by residents of Sang Suria Condominium in Jalan Ipoh, Malaysia, for misappropriation of funds has filed a legal notice against them for defamation.
ACCESSION #
82830088

 

Related Articles

  • Probe goes on for Travelzest.  // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;5/29/2009, Issue 2868, p4 

    The article reports on the plan of Travelzest PLC to proceed its investigation into the misappropriation of company funds, despite a lawsuit issued by its chief executive officer (CEO) Chris Mottershead in Great Britain. The firm has been investigating into the allegations involving Mottershead,...

  • Embraced by scandal. Binduraj, J. // India Today;3/10/2014, p1 

    The article focuses on the scandal involving the Mata Amritanandamayi Math (MAM) caused by the allegations of sexual abuse, physical violence and financial misappropriations written by Gail Tredwell, a former MAM disciple also known as Gayatri, in her book "Holy Hell: A Memoir of Faith, Devotion...

  • Keeping down the cost of libel suits.  // Commonweal;2/22/85, Vol. 112 Issue 5, p100 

    Editorial. The current, raging controversy about defamation suits by public figures against the media ignores a critical element--the requirement that any libel action be accompanied by provable and measurable damages. The courts should require that issues of damages be litigated first, not...

  • Courtesy keeps you out of trouble.  // Folio: The Magazine for Magazine Management;8/1/94, Vol. 23 Issue 13, p9 

    Discusses the proper attitude in dealing with libel suits and the parties that file them. Sensitivity to plaintiff's case; Publication of corrective statement; Favorable and not-so-favorable aspects of libel suits.

  • Toward "Hired Gun" Control. Kostelanetz, Richard // Humanist;May/Jun96, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p3 

    Focuses on libel suits. Functions; Principal objection to libel suits; Public attention on complainants; Cost issues.

  • Supreme Court upholds public figure libel charge. Fields, H. // Publishers Weekly;7/14/89, Vol. 236 Issue 2, p12 

    Discusses the US Supreme Court's ruling on Daniel Connaughton's suit against the Hamilton, Ohio, `Journal News' for libel. Connaughton, a candidate for municipal judge had been a victim of `malicious intent.'

  • When are you filching someone's good name?  // Supervisory Management;Jun95, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p5 

    Focuses on libel and slander. Differing points; Similar general elements.

  • Stopping libel suits.  // Washington Monthly;Nov85, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p12 

    This year, a series of libel suits has raised the usual drumbeat of complaints about threats to press freedom to a crescendo. To lessen the possible chilling effects of such suits on the press, libeled public figures should be required to accept retractions rather than financial awards that...

  • Defamation by action may `speak as loudly as words'. Roline, Alan C. // Public Personnel Management;Winter97, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p497 

    Focuses on the potential risk of defamation by action faced by companies in the United States in light of the 1995 case `Bolton vs. Department of Human Services.' Definition of defamation; Details of the case; Other defamation action cases; Lessons for employers.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics