'DOMA' declared unconstitutional, will same-sex petitions be possible?

October 2012
Filipino Reporter;10/19/2012, Vol. 40 Issue 46, p22
The article reports on the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York declaring the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional, to the extent the law attempted to ban or refuse to recognize same-sex marriages.


Related Articles

  • Regulatory Fictions: On Marriage and Countermarriage. Emens, Elizabeth F. // California Law Review;Feb2011, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p235 

    Debates about marriage currently capture much public attention. Scholars have pushed beyond the question of whether gays are worthy of marriage to ask whether marriage is worthy of gays. The present moment of questioning marriage in its current form may be brief Thus, we should take this...

  • Law firm drops DOMA defense. Keen, Lisa // Bay Windows;4/28/2011, Vol. 29 Issue 20, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the law firm King & Spalding LLP to withdraw as counsel for the U.S. House in defense of the same-sex marriage ban of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

  • Untitled.  // Hays Free Press (Buda, TX);7/3/2013, Vol. 111 Issue 14, p3A 

    A cartoon is presented about Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

  • Plan sponsors take action in DOMA ruling. GODSOE, JOHN // Buffalo Law Journal;8/19/2013, Vol. 85 Issue 42, p3 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case U.S. v. Windsor which deals with the ruling of the Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which prohibits same-sex marriage legalization.

  • Obama drops defense of antigay marriage law.  // Christian Century;3/22/2011, Vol. 128 Issue 6, p17 

    The article reports on the official position of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to not defend the Defense of Marriage Act as of March 2011.

  • 15 years of DOMA.  // Bay Area Reporter;5/12/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 19, p6 

    The author reflects on the achievements of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) signed by the U.S. President Bill Clinton on May 7, 1996 that mandates discrimination against same-sex couples in various ways, which seems to fall short of meeting the principles of federalism and prevents complete...

  • DOMA AND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. Cain, Patricia A. // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2009, Vol. 84 Issue 2, p481 

    The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose under federal tax law. The primary justification for this rule is that tax benefits should be preserved for opposite-sex married couples. This article points out the absurdity of such a rule, given...

  • Supreme Court makes landmark decisions. Giampolo, Angela D. // Philadelphia Gay News;7/5/2013, Vol. 37 Issue 27, p14 

    In this article, the author discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Section three of the federal Defense of Marriage Act and vacate the constitutional amendment California's Proposition 8, which would give right to same-sex California couples to marry.

  • Respect for Marriage Act would repeal DOMA.  // Empty Closet;Apr2011, Issue 444, pA17 

    The article reports on the introduction of a bill that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and provide federal protections for married same-sex couples in the U.S. House of Representatives on March 16, 2011.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics