Michigan drive to end affirmative action put on hold

May 1998
Black Issues in Higher Education;05/28/98, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p7
Reports that a petition drive to rid Michigan of race- and gender-based preferences in college admissions, hiring and state contracts has been put on hold until the year 2000 election. Promise of the organizers to continue the collection of signatures; Provision of Proposition 209; Number of signatures need to present the petition.


Related Articles

  • Moving Toward a Color-Blind Society.  // Trends Magazine;Aug2013, Issue 124, p34 

    The article focuses on the adoption of affirmative action in the U.S. to undo racism. It states that people who supported affirmative action wanted to increase minorities' role in colleges, banks and other institutions. It mentions that affirmative action allows minority students to get...

  • Calif. Regent Ward Connerly Closes Controversial Tenure. Sack, Joetta L // Education Week;1/26/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 20, p25 

    The article reports that Ward Connerly, who drew both praise and criticism for his views on race in education, attended his final meeting as his term expired. He is best known for his work opposing affirmative action and racial preferences, including a 1995 regents' vote banning race-based...

  • Social Change and Democratic Values: Reconceptualizing Affirmative Action Policy. Guinier, Lani // Western Journal of Black Studies;Spring2003, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p45 

    Examines the affirmative action policy that links all admission practices to the broad purpose and public character of higher education in a multiracial democracy in the U.S. Relationship between individual merit and operational fairness; Evaluation of the democratic values such as...

  • Supreme Court Issues Affirmative Action Rulings. Littrell, Amy W. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q2, p1 

    The article cites affirmative action rulings issued by the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held in Grutter versus Bollinger that student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions. The court found in Gratz versus Bollinger that the...

  • Deconstructing Affirmative Action. McPherson, James M. // Perspectives;Apr2003, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p5 

    Comments on the impact on affirmative action of a case before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the University of Michigan's undergraduate and law school admissions criteria. Facts of the case; Opposition to quotas in admissions; Social and legal complexities of the affirmative action issue.

  • Handling of portfolios in college admissions stirs host of questions. Ponessa, Jeanne; Gamble, Cheryl // Education Week;11/6/96, Vol. 16 Issue 10, p12 

    Reports on the difficulties high school guidance counselors and college admission officers meet in keeping admissions policies up to date with regard to alternative assessments and affirmative actions. Uncertainties expressed by participants during the 1996 College Board conference on how to...

  • STUDENT ATTITUDES TOWARD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS. Sax, Linda J.; Arredondo, Marisol // Research in Higher Education;Aug99, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p439 

    Using a national sample of over 277,850 college freshmen, this study examines attitudes toward affirmative action in college admissions separately for four racial/ethnic groups: whites/Caucasians, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and Mexican-Americans. For each group, analyses address the...

  • Pulling for a Michigan Victory. Taber, George M. // njbiz;3/3/2003, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p7 

    Focuses on the participation of a number of U.S. companies in an amicus curiae brief that supports affirmative action regarding the admission practices of the undergraduate and law schools of the University of Michigan. Issues raised by the document with regard to diversity in the workplace as...

  • Officials mull the impact of prop 209 legal battle on college admissions. Johnston, Robert C. // Education Week;12/11/96, Vol. 16 Issue 15, p16 

    Reports on California's Proposition 209, a measure aimed to end race and gender preferences in the state's affirmative action program. Effects of the measure on college admissions; Legal dispute over the measure.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics