Distributive Justice in the State of Nature: An Egalitarian View

Hinton, Timothy
August 2012
South African Journal of Philosophy;2012, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p517
Academic Journal
This paper proposes a novel egalitarian answer to the question: what initial distribution of the world's resources could possibly count as just? Like many writers in the natural rights tradition, I take for granted that distributive justice consists in conformity to pre-political principles that apply to property regimes. Against the background of that assumption, the paper distinguishes between broadly Lockean and broadly Grotian conceptions of distributive justice in the state of nature. After an extended critique of various versions of the Lockean approach, it argues for a particular, egalitarian version of the Grotian view. My position is based on what I call the common ownership formula, which says: each human being, as an equal co-owner of the world's resources, may use those resources provided that the terms of their use are in conformity with principles that no co-owner could reasonably reject as the basis of an informed, unforced general agreement between all of the world's co-owners who sought to find equitable principles of resource division. Using this principle, I suggest how an unequivocally egalitarian view of pre-political entitlement can be justified without recourse to any alleged duty to ameliorate the effects of brute bad luck on people's lives.


Related Articles

  • NOTA CRÍTICA. Pobreza, marginación y desigualdad en Monterrey. Puntos de partida.  // Frontera Norte;Ene-Jun2005, Vol. 17 Issue 33, p133 

    No abstract available.

  • Income Inequalities in a Context of Political Equality: Guaranteed Basic Income, No Guaranteed Income, or Guaranteed Work Opportunities. Scharding, Tobey // Social Theory & Practice;Jan2014, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p99 

    This paper investigates individual differences-based income entitlements (entitlements based on people's contributions, efforts, and needs) in a context of political equality. Three regimes for distributing income are considered: guaranteed basic income (GBI), no guaranteed income (NGI), and...

  • Distributing Indivisible Goods Fairly: Evidence from a Questionnaire Study. Herreiner, Dorothea K.; Puppe, Clemens // Analyse & Kritik;dez2007, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p235 

    We report the results of a questionnaire study on the fair distribution of indivisible goods. We collected data from three different subject pools, first- and second- year students majoring in economics, law students, and advanced economics students with some background knowledge of fairness...

  • Sample Selection Bias in Analyses of the Political Democracy and Income Inequality Relationship. Hughes, Marion R. // Social Forces;Mar97, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p1101 

    The article focuses on the relationship between political democracy and income inequality. The relationship between the level of political democracy and the distribution of income within a country has been actively researched in recent decades. However, cross-national research has yielded...

  • Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution. Anbarci, Nejat; Sun, Ching-jen // Social Choice & Welfare;Aug2011, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p453 

    Suppes-Sen dominance or SS-proofness (SSP) is a commonly accepted criterion of impartiality in distributive justice. Mariotti (Review of Economic Studies, 66, 733-741, 1999) characterized the Nash bargaining solution using Nash's (Econometrica, 18, 155-162, 1950) scale invariance (SI) axiom and...

  • Popular Attitudes toward Distributive Injustice: Beijing and Warsaw Compared. Whyte, Martin; Han, Chunping // Journal of Chinese Political Science;Apr2008, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p29 

    Popular reactions to the transition from centrally planned socialism to a market-based economy are explored through an examination of survey data on distributive justice and injustice attitudes in Beijing, China, in 2000, and in Warsaw, Poland, in 2001. In both capitals objective socioeconomic...

  • The Fallacy of Equality. Reed, Lawrence W. // Freeman: Ideas on Liberty;Jun2012, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p4 

    The article discusses issues concerning economic equality in the U.S. The author describes economic equality in a free society as a mirage that is being envisioned by redistributionists, highlighting fairness in terms of economic income or material wealth. He also highlights the myriad examples...

  • Inequality Is Untenable. Ramcharan, Rodney // Finance & Development;Sep2010, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p24 

    The article discusses the issue of income inequality within a society. It states that policymakers should treat inequality as an important policy concern for it can have significant economic and social costs for individuals and the society as a whole. It adds that inequality has grown worse in...

  • A bitter choice turned sweet: How acknowledging individuals' concern at having a low relative income serves to align utilitarianism and egalitarianism. Stark, Oded; Jakubek, Marcin; Kobus, Martyna // Journal of Evolutionary Economics;Jul2015, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p541 

    When individuals' utility is a convex combination of their income and their concern at having a low relative income (the weights attached to income and to the concern at having a low relative income sum up to one), the maximization of aggregate utility yields an equal income distribution. This...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics