TITLE

CLIA inspection deficiencies--what they mean and how to avoid them

AUTHOR(S)
Orton, Sharyn
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Sep2012, Vol. 44 Issue 9, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article highlights the importance of performing mock Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) inspections in examining overall compliance with the CLIA regulations, while offering online access for mock CLIA inspections checklist. He addresses regulatory requirement for staff qualification and proficiency testing (PT). It also highlights the importance of reading and reviewing the CLIA regulations, underlining the Interpretive Guidelines as a good source of reference.
ACCESSION #
79793963

 

Related Articles

  • Washington report. U.S. Congress considers CLIA referral legislation. Stine, Vincent // MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Nov2012, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p52 

    The article reports tha House of Representatives recently passed H.R.6118 bill for clinical medical laboratories which gives the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) greater flexibility in determining the appropriate sanctions for a clinical laboratory that sends a proficiency...

  • With MDx here, what are the implications for LIS? Schmidt, Megan // MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Jul2015, Vol. 47 Issue 7, p16 

    The article discusses the implications of molecular diagnostics (MDx) on the clinical Laboratory Information System (LIS). Topics covered include lesser use of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) with cheaper and less complex MDx and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- approved in vitro diagnostic...

  • Is your POCT program inspection-ready? Mardis, Connie; Gundler, Daniel C. // MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Dec2015, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p28 

    The article indicates that new point-of-care (POC) testing (POCT) is one tool to help facilitate the implementation of the new Individual Quality Control Plan (IQCP). Topics discussed include the new IQCP option talking effect on January 1, 2016. Also mentioned are strategies and tools available...

  • Clinical Lab Equipment Validation – Simplify and Be Compliant. Satyadi, Caroline // Clinical Leadership & Management Review;2013 Quater2, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p26 

    The article focuses on the validation of clinical laboratory (lab) equipment. It discusses the importance of the equipment validation process in ensuring patient safety, the need for labs to meet the equipment validation requirements stated in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of...

  • Effects of CLIA '88 on the physician office laboratory: A survey of midsized pediatric practices... Benjamin, John T. // Clinical Pediatrics;Mar1996, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p125 

    Presents the results of a survey on the effect of the 1988 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments on pediatric office laboratory testing in the United States. Absence of significant differences in the test menus offered; Evidence of reduction in volume of testing; Compliance of the clinics...

  • CMS Issues Final Rule on Proficiency Testing Referrals. McCarty, Michael N. // AMT Events;Jun2014, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p66 

    No abstract available.

  • Reader Q&A. Lanese, Jerry; Smith, Alan J. // Journal of GXP Compliance;Winter2011, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p29 

    The article presents questions and answers related to Good X Practice (GXP) compliance including the frequency or time for conducting verification of a preventive action after implementation and minimum requirements for batch records to the production floor.

  • Overcoming Challenges and Hurdles of the Clinical Laboratory Accreditation Survey -- Building a Sustained and Successful Quality System. Satyadi, Caroline // Clinical Leadership & Management Review;Apr2011, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p6 

    The article focuses on the development of sustained and successful quality system in response to clinical laboratory accreditation survey. It mentions on the composition and responsibility of quality assurance committee on quality audit (QA) practices as well as the effects of omitting standard...

  • Applications of Sanctions by the CMS and by Accrediting Organizations for Unsuccessful Proficiency Testing Performance: A 9-Year Study. Karger, Amy B.; Killeen, Anthony A. // Clinical Leadership & Management Review;Sep2011, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p20 

    The article presents a study on the imposition of sanctions by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) or accrediting organizations for unsuccessful proficiency testing (PT) performance. The study has reviewed the Laboratory Registry (LR) documents from 2001 to 2009 including a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics