TITLE

Defining a "Spouse" in Trust Documents

AUTHOR(S)
Ebner, Daniel; Prather, Ray
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
Trusts & Estates;Sep2012, Vol. 151 Issue 9, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses same-sex partners and the drafting of trust documents as of September 1, 2012, focusing on how to properly define a spouse in such documents in light of the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act's prohibition against the federal recognition of same-sex marriage. According to the article, several U.S. states allow same-sex civil marriages, including Massachusetts and New York, while others such as Oregon allow same-sex civil unions. The issue of jurisdiction is also mentioned.
ACCESSION #
79787898

 

Related Articles

  • Hardly the Same. HAUSER, SUSAN G. // Workforce Management;Sep2011, Vol. 90 Issue 9, p24 

    The article focuses on the problems being faced by same-sex couples in the U.S. due to difference in federal and state same-sex marriage laws. It informs that couples getting married under same-sex marriage made legal in various states are not entitled to federal benefits and states that under...

  • Should We Say 'I Do'? EINHEUSER, MICHAEL // Between the Lines (10807551);6/26/2014, Vol. 2226/2227, p35 

    The article offers the author's insights on the legal issues faced by same-sex couples in Michigan, citing the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court under the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which defined marriage and spouse as husbands and wives of the opposite sex.

  • Same Sex Marriage - Immigration Benefits 2013. Nachman, David; Phulwani, Michael // News India Times;7/26/2013, Vol. 44 Issue 30, p28 

    The article reflects on the decision made by the U.D. Supreme Court regarding the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in July 2013 that has allowed equal rights to the same-sex couples and also focuses on its impact on the immigration status, immigrant visa petition and same-sex marriage.

  • NEW BENEFITS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES.  // Business Insurance;7/1/2013, Vol. 47 Issue 13, p0029 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act which would result to expansion of the rights and benefits to eligible married same-sex couples, with regulatory guidance needed to determine eligibility criteria.

  • "There's No Place Like Home" DOMA Deportation: The Forced Expatriation of Bi-national Same-Sex Couples from the United States to Canada. NGUYEN, ANH "ANNIE" // San Diego International Law Journal;Fall2012, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p225 

    The article discusses concerns related to same-sex couples who are forced to expel from the U.S. and Canada due to the adverse effect on their relationship under the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). It also discusses the consequences faced by same-sex couples who expatriate to Canada. It...

  • Same-Sex Binational Couples and the Federal Defense of Marriage Act. Turner, Ilona M. // Federal Lawyer;Mar2012, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p44 

    The article focuses on the rights of same-sex binational couples facing deportation. Topics include the U.S. Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the concept of immigrant intent, and countries outside of the U.S. that recognize same-sex marriage. Information is provided on the...

  • Gay and lesbian spousal petitions now possible? GURFINKEL, MICHAEL J. // Filipino Reporter;6/28/2013, Vol. 41 Issue 30, p18 

    The author comments on decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 2013 that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. He explains the key aspects of ruling which also makes same-sex marriages valid once again in California. He also notes that the ruling makes it possible for...

  • Constitutional Rights versus State Autonomy and Direct Democracy: The Story So Far on Same-Sex Marriage. Nunan, Richard // APA Newsletters;Fall2009, Vol. 9 Issue 1, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the discourses on constitutional rights versus state autonomy and direct democracy in relation to U.S. same-sex marriage. The 1993 ruling of the Hawaii Supreme Court in Baehr versus Levin which recognize such marriages under the full faith and credit clause of the U.S....

  • DOMA RULING FORCES BENEFITS REDO.  // Business Insurance;7/1/2013, Vol. 47 Issue 13, p0012 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that invalidated the 1996 federal law that barred recognition of same-sex marriages. The ruling declaring the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional extends employer-provided benefits such as health insurance to same-sex couples in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics