Wager, Elizabeth; Kleiner, Sabine
September 2012
Acta Informatica Medica;2012, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p136
Academic Journal
Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations. Institutions should: have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently; inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published; respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work; initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals; have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct. Journals should: publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity; inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns; cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegations; be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COPE guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations; have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.


Related Articles

  • A bibliometric study of publications by Indian ophthalmologists and vision researchers, 2001-06. Kumaragurupari, R.; Sieving, Pamela C.; Lalitha, Prajna // Indian Journal of Ophthalmology;Jun2010, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p275 

    Objective: The objective was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of Indian ophthalmic papers published from 2001 to 2006 in the peer-reviewed journals, to assess productivity, trends in journal choice, publication types, research funding, and collaborative research. Materials and Methods: We...

  • Futuro de la investigación cientiíica en Colombia. Jaimes Valencia, Mary Luz // MedUNAB;abr-jul2013, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p5 

    No abstract available.

  • Source-ful science.  // Nature Structural & Molecular Biology;Oct2015, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p751 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including transparency of scientific paper, atomic structures and reanalysis of source data.

  • Cruising for Bruising. Cohn, Meryl // Just Out;3/6/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p41 

    The article offers an answer to the question on how to deal with an officemate who surfs gay porn obsessively during office hours.

  • The Poehlman case: understanding and indexing ethical problems in scientific journals. Brown, Carolyn // Indexer;Dec2011, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p179 

    Ethical problems in scientific publishing lead to complex issues for indexers. It is important for indexers of both scientific journals and literature databases to understand ethical problems and the 'cascade' of publications that can result. Common problems involve authorship issues, duplicate...

  • Message from the Editor-in-Chief. İŞMAN, Aytekin // Turkish Online Journal of Science & Technology;Jan2014, Vol. 4 Issue 1, preceding p1 

    A message from the "Online Journal of Science and Technology" editor-in-chief is presented wherein he acknowledges the readers, researchers and academicians who support the journal and mentions plans for international research by his team.

  • Appendix: Publishing Policies and Publishing Ethics. Crothers, Charles // New Zealand Sociology;2014, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p115 

    The article focuses on an appendix prepared by the author by focusing on various aspects including ethical codes, political interests, research funding and government policies. As mentioned, the appendix can be understood by taking help from the Great Britain's Royal Society. It further lists...

  • Letter from the Editor. Bryant, Christopher // Canadian Journal of Regional Science;2010 Supplement, Vol. 33, preceding p5 

    An introduction to this special issue of the "Canadian Journal of Regional Science" is presented.

  • Scientific Publication Trends and the Developing World. Galvez, Antonio; Maqueda, Mercedes // American Scientist;Nov/Dec2000, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p526 

    Offers a look at the trends in the publication of international scientific journals listed in the Science Citation Index of 160 nations from 1991 through 1998 to analyze scientific progress. Regional distribution of authorship; Collaboration for publication; Changes in the publications over the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics