Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements Focus on Largest Emitters

Kuhar, Mark S.
August 2012
Rock Products;Aug2012, Vol. 115 Issue 8, p44
The article highlights the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision not to revise greenhouse gas (GHG) permitting thresholds under the Clean Air Act announced in 2010. It notes the final rule is part of EPA's common-sense, phased-in approach to GHG permitting under the Clean Air Act. It also highlights the permitting requirements' focus on the largest U.S. emitters that account for nearly 70 percent of the total GHG pollution from stationary sources.


Related Articles

  • EPA's air program: Still hazy after all these years. Neville, Angela // Power;Sep2008, Vol. 152 Issue 9, p70 

    The article discusses the controversy on air pollution provisions in the U.S. The decision of the federal court on the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) resulted to dissatisfaction. Stephen Johnson, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), commented on the decisions of the...

  • EPA says it lacks power to police emissions. Johnson, Jim // Waste News;9/15/2003, Vol. 9 Issue 10, p20 

    Greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles cannot be regulated through the Clean Air Act because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says it lacks the authority. The agency had been asked by the International Center for Technology Assessment and other groups to create regulations....

  • Proposed Rules: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;1/22/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 14, p3557 

    The article presents a proposed rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states that the Agency has proposed a rule entitled "Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units." It announces that a public...

  • EPA Grants California GHG Waiver Request. Bergeson, Lynn L. // Pollution Engineering;Sep2009, Vol. 41 Issue 9, p23 

    The article reports on the move of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to grant the greenhouse gas (GHG) program waiver request to California on June 30, 2009. It notes that the approval signifies the strong support of EPA for science-based waivers of federal preemption of GHG motor...

  • Washington Scene. Gray, Allan W.; Outlaw, Joe L. // Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues;2007 1st Quarter, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p3 

    The article offers legislation news briefs in the U.S. as of March 2007. Discussion of the 2007 Farm Bill is centered on the funding of legislation's agricultural program priorities. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency has the legal authority under the Clean Air...

  • WARMING UP TO CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION. Adler, Jonathan H. // Virginia Law Review;May2009, Vol. 95 Issue 3, p63 

    An essay is presented on climate change legal proceeding. It notes the Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Mass. v. EPA) court case that has been tightly observed by the justices. It notes the move of the court in dispatching opposing arguments and redefining prior precedents. It...

  • STATE'S RULES.  // Pollution Engineering;Aug2007, Vol. 39 Issue 8, p74 

    The article discusses various updates on pollution control laws of various states in the U.S. California's 14-member market advisory committee had released their final report of recommendations about the design of cap-and-trade system to lower greenhouse gas emissions in the state. Atlanta,...

  • Proposed Rules: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;2/26/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 38, p10750 

    The article presents a notice of data availability (NODA) and a proposed rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states that the Agency issues the NODA to back the rule, Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility...

  • Cap and Trade How It Works.  // Audubon;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 109 Issue 6, p55 

    The article examines how a cap-and-trade system works as a regulatory tool to reduce a particular kind of pollutant. Discussed are variations by which a cap-and-trade system decreases pollution using electric utilities as a test case. It implies that the U.S. Congress would come up with a...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics