TITLE

Federal statutory law. Hazardous waste law. United States v. Bestfoods

AUTHOR(S)
White, Omar N.
PUB. DATE
June 1999
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;1999, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p757
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
7942715

 

Related Articles

  • A Uniform Approach for Determining Arranger Liability Under CERCLA. Reger, Maralyn Milne // Brigham Young University Law Review;1998, Vol. 1998 Issue 3, p1241 

    Focuses on the development and implementation of a uniform approach for the determination of liability issues pertaining to hazardous waste spills, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability act of 1980 (CERCLA). Purpose of the CERCLA; Details on the...

  • `Site'-ing a good example. Olsen, Roger; Brown, Jack // American City & County;Aug93, Vol. 108 Issue 9, p68 

    Reports on the action taken by the City of Wichita in Kansas to avoid a listing under the Superfund Act, 1980 upon Kansas Department of Health and Environment's (KDHE) discovery of chlorinated solvents in the aquifer under the Gilbert-Mosley area. Remedial investigation and feasibility study;...

  • Contaminated property: recipe for disaster. Gunsett, Daniel J.; Mazanec, Mark R. // ABA Banking Journal;Dec89, Vol. 81 Issue 12, p15 

    Focuses on the enforcement of environmental legislation to recover the money spent each year to clean up contaminated property in the U.S. Effect of the clean-up costs to the lender; Impact of the federal and state environmental laws on the real estate transactions; Emergence of environmental...

  • IT waste: a chance to clean up. Reakers, Phil // Computer Weekly;6/13/2002, p46 

    Focuses on the implementation of rules for the safe disposal of old computers by the government in the European Union countries. Obligation of the information technology departments and companies to dispose redundant equipment; Entrance of the directives in the Great Britain law; Payment of...

  • Superfund reform a political football. Triplett, Tim // Industrial Paint & Powder;Mar96, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p56 

    Comments on the chances of having a meaningful Superfund reform within 1996. Dumping of hazardous waste in legal landfills; Splitting of cleanup costs between private companies and the federal government; Retroactive liability.

  • EXXONMOBIL SETTLES MAJOR RCRA LAWSUIT. Franz, Neil // Chemical Week;12/19/2001, Vol. 163 Issue 46, p13 

    Reports that ExxonMobil has settled its hazardous wastes lawsuit from its violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in the United States.

  • Study sees Superfund savings.  // Business Insurance;9/11/95, Vol. 29 Issue 37, p2 

    Reports that shifting the focus of the Superfund program from removing contaminated risks to controlling future risks would reduce projected costs according to a study conducted by the Joint Institute for Energy & Environment.

  • Legal costs, budget cuts bedevil Superfund. Knickerbocker, Brad // Christian Science Monitor;3/5/96, Vol. 88 Issue 68, p11 

    Reports on the debate surrounding the `Superfund,' a law aimed at the restoration of dangerous polluted sites around the United States. Critics view of the law; How the formation of the Superfund came about; Superfund nicknamed for the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and...

  • EPA's SITE program: Sharing innovation risks with industry. Lindsey, Alfred; Kelly, Meg // EPA Journal;Fall94, Vol. 20 Issue 3/4, p24 

    Presents a brief summary of the Superfund experience with technology applications during the program's first six years. How the program, begun in 1980, struggled to apply limited and often inadequate technologies to some very complex clean-up problems; Containment devices for hazardous waste;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics