Strategic litigating in land use cases: Del Monte Dunes v. City of Monterey

Anderson, Karena C.
March 1998
Ecology Law Quarterly;1998, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p465
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Accepting the relegation of Takings claims to state courts: the Federal courts' misguided attempts to avoid preclusion under Williamson County Kovacs, Kathryn E. // Ecology Law Quarterly;1999, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1 

    No abstract.

  • Case Notes. Humphreys, Matthew // Environmental Law Review;2003, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p134 

    Focuses on cases relating to environmental laws. Summary of the policy of the Mayor of London, England regarding congestion charging; Judgment of the court on the case of land use in the U.S.

  • Business Owners Cheered by Court Ruling. Daks, Martin C. // njbiz;3/3/2008, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p2 

    The article announces the decision of an Appellate Court in New Jersey on the case Harrison Redevelopment Authority v. DeRose wherein the court held that the absence of specific written notice of an intention to seize property would give the owner's right to raise such defenses is preserved,...

  • When is Eminent Domain Eminently Unfair? Hudgins, Matt // National Real Estate Investor;May2005, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p14 

    The article reports that the real estate developers counting on city governments to use eminent domain to clear urban renewal sites are watching to see if the U.S. Supreme Court favors property owners in a high-profile eminent domain dispute. The Court is expected to rule in June 2005 in the...

  • Florida Residents File Suit to Halt Eminent Domain-Fueled Development. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;9/27/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32475, p32 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed against The Institute for Justice on behalf of property owners in Riviera Beach, Florida to halt eminent domain-fueled redevelopment projects. Under the redevelopment of the city's waterfront, the lands of residents may be taken over by the city to pursue...

  • he Tyranny Of Eminent Domain. Salzman, Larry; Epstein, Alex // Business Journal (Central New York);7/1/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 26, p24 

    Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in "Kelo v. City of New London." Local governments' use of power of eminent domain to transfer private property from private owner to another in pursuit of public interest; Demolition of homes in New London, Connecticut.

  • Rethinking the Facial Takings Claim. Zhou, David // Yale Law Journal;Jan2011, Vol. 120 Issue 4, p967 

    In this article, the author discusses the significance of the elimination of the facial regulatory takings claim in court cases. He cites the case Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, in which the court accepted the facial takings claim in favor of the plaintiff. He examines the legal consequences and...

  • Court ruling could affect county eminent domain law. Golden, John // Westchester County Business Journal;7/5/2010, Vol. 49 Issue 27, p3 

    The article analyzes the impact of the New York Court of Appeals' decision to the case of landlord Nick Sprayregen on the domain law of Westchester County, New York. It states that the decision can affect the county's use of eminent domain when supporting private development projects. According...

  • Planning and Nuisance: Revisiting the Balance of Public and Private Interests in Land-Use Development. Bishop, Patrick; Jenkins, Victoria // Journal of Environmental Law;Jul2011, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p285 

    This article considers the balance of public and private interests in land-use planning; in particular, we seek to explore the nuisance/planning interface in light of two relatively recent developments in England and Wales, namely the Court of Appeal decision in Watson v Croft Promo-Sport and...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics