TITLE

Attorney fees in private party cost recovery actions under CERCLA

AUTHOR(S)
Keenan, Lora E.
PUB. DATE
February 1995
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;1995, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p449
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
7942629

 

Related Articles

  • Legal fees not recoverable.  // Occupational Hazards;Sep94, Vol. 56 Issue 9, p68 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's ruling in `Key Tronic Corp. v. United States' that most attorney's fees incurred in litigating private cost recovery actions under CERCLA are not recoverable.

  • Private party cleanup: Consistency under the 1990 National Contingency Plan. Pusch, Jeffrey W. // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;Fall91, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p217 

    Discusses the statutory provision in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) that grants private parties the ability to recover their cleanup costs from other responsible parties. Potentially responsible parties and liability; Private cause of...

  • DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AFFIRMATIVE COST RECOVERY AGAINST PRIVATE THIRD PARTIES. Collier, Renee M.; Evans, Timothy J. // Air Force Law Review;2006, Vol. 58, p125 

    The article discusses the issue of recovering funds from third parties when the U.S. Department of Defense has expended money to clean up environmental contamination. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), private parties are permitted to recover...

  • Setting CERCLA claims against subsidiaries: Insurance considerations. Paar, Randy; Arden, Suzan // Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Fing;10/14/96, Vol. 10 Issue 21, p6 

    Examines the issues to consider before settling claims filed by present facility owners as private cost-recovery actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act (CERCLA). Parent corporation's liability under CERCLA for acts of a subsidiary; Insurance...

  • The Illegality of Contingency Fee Arrangements When Prosecuting Public Natural Resource Damage Claims and the Need for Legislative Reform. Steiner, Julie E. // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Nov2008, Vol. 38 Issue 11, p10773 

    State governments are contracting with private contingency fee attorneys to pursue natural resource damage (NRD) claims as the government's "special counsel." This arrangement is hailed for funding the government's ability to bring NRD claims where such claims had previously stagnated. Others,...

  • NEITHER JOINT NOR SEVERAL: ORPHAN SHARES AND PRIVATE CERCLA ACTIONS. Kilbert, Kenneth K. // Environmental Law (00462276);Fall2011, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p1045 

    The broad liability scheme of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) often results in multiple "responsible parties" being liable for the costs of cleaning up a contaminated site. Typically, CERCLA cleanup costs are allocated among the various...

  • UNPAID SUB CAN'T USE CERCLA TO RECOVER FROM OWNER THAT'S 'BORNE THE COSTS OF ITS ACTIONS'.  // Construction Claims Monthly;Jul2014, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p49 

    The article discusses the U.S. court case Price Trucking Corp. v. Norampac Industries, Inc. wherein landowner Norampac Industries, Inc. has claimed wages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The court of appeals has considered the landownes...

  • Supreme Court Upholds Private Right of Action under CERCLA.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. versus Atlantic Research Corp. upholding the private right of action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). It notes that the decision has restored the former understanding of...

  • S.C. DEP'T OF HEALTH & ENVTL. CONTROL v. COMMERCE & INDUS. INS. CO.: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT RCRA'S DIRECT ACTION PROVISION MAY NOT BE USED TO SECURE COST RECOVERY AND CONTRIBUTION FOR CORRECTIVE... Zivkovich, M. Trent // University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law;Fall2004, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p87 

    Reports that, in the case S.C. Department of Health & Environmental Control v. Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co., the Fourth Circuit of Appeals has affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina that the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act's direct action...

  • Receiving CERCLA's Liability. Northcutt, K. Jason // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;Summer2000, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p779 

    Deals with the history, structure and purpose of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 concerning the United States Supreme Court and the Environmental Protection Agency attorneys' fees. Principles the court deals with when evaluating fee...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics