TITLE

Watching the candy store: EPA overfiling of local air pollution variances

AUTHOR(S)
Melnick, Marc; Willes, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
February 1993
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;1993, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p207
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
7942606

 

Related Articles

  • EPA extends MACT Hammer deadline to May 15, 2004. Ware, Ethan R.; Baker, Pamela A. // South Carolina Business Journal;Apr2002, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p6 

    Reports the extension given by the Environmental Protection Agency on the deadline for complying to a legislation on hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in the U.S. Aim of the amendments to reduce the burden on affected facilities; Requirements for HAP sources to comply with the maximum achievable...

  • EPA Finalizes Paper And Web Coating MACT. Millar, Sheila A. // Paper, Film & Foil Converter;Feb2003, Vol. 77 Issue 2, p18 

    Analyzes the United States Environmental Protection Agency's maximum achievable control technology standard governing sources of hazardous air pollutants that are engaged in the coating of paper, plastic film, metallic foil and other web surfaces. Provisions of the standard.

  • Clinton backs EPA.  // Pit & Quarry;Aug97, Vol. 90 Issue 2, p4 

    Reports on the Bill Clinton administration's support for the Environmental Protection Agency's new clean air regulations. Detail's of the agency's 10-year implementation plans.

  • Dow Chemical Company v. United States and aerial surveillance by theEPA: an argument for post-surveillance notice to the observed  // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;Spring88, Vol. 15 Issue 3/4, p593 

    No abstract available.

  • Court backs air standards. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;4/1/2002, Vol. 7 Issue 25, p1 

    Reports issues on the right of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to impose strict regulations on air quality in the U.S. Effort of EPA to promote better public health; Reduction of the levels of fine particulate matter; Implication of the regulations for the compliance with the Clean...

  • Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency.  // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Dec2001 Filing Instructions, Vol. 31 Issue 12, p20834 

    Reports on the District of Columbia Circuit Court's decision on a case involving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's hazardous air pollutant emission standards for hazardous waste combustors. Maximum achievable control technology; Process variability in pollution control devices.

  • Husqvarna AB v. Environmental Protection Agency.  // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Dec2001 Filing Instructions, Vol. 31 Issue 12, p20867 

    Reports on the District of Columbia Circuit Court's decision on a case involving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Act Phase 2 emissions standards for new non-road spark-ignition handheld engines. Development of compression wave technology; Family emission limit.

  • Something In the Air. Plueddeman, Charles // Boating;Oct2007, Vol. 80 Issue 10, p54 

    The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is proposing emission regulations that will affect not just engine builders but also boat manufacturers.

  • Emission Impossible. Dawson, Dudley // Yachting;Jun2000, Vol. 187 Issue 6, p32 

    Discusses the regulations imposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency which focused on emission-reduction in boat engines.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics