TITLE

National Wildlife Federation v. FERC and Washington State Departmentof Fisheries v. FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ignores Ninth Circuit rebuke on hydropower permitting

AUTHOR(S)
Feldman, Murray D.
PUB. DATE
February 1988
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;1988, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p319
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
7942511

 

Related Articles

  • Friends of Cowlitz v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Nov2001 Filing Instructions, Vol. 31 Issue 11, p20702 

    Discusses the case 'Friends of the Cowlitz v. U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,' whereby a court denied environmental groups' petitions to review the commission's decision not to bring enforcement action against a city in the state of Washington for violating terms of an operating...

  • Greens Sue FERC Over Marcellus Pipe Review. WOODWORTH, CHAD // Energy Daily;2/17/2012, Issue 34, p2 

    The article reports on a lawsuit filed by environmental law group Earthjustice against the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for allegedly failing to assess the environmental effects of building a proposed interstate pipeline to serve the Marcellus Shale. Conditional approval for...

  • Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC v. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.; Notice of Complaint. Bose, Kimberly D. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;8/9/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 154, p47621 

    The article presents a notice of complaint filed by Hudson Transmission Partners LLC against New York Independent System Operator Inc. alleging unjust practices issued by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

  • NPGA seeks equitable linefill program. Auxier, Doug // LP/Gas;Dec2003, Vol. 63 Issue 12, p52 

    Focuses on issues related to the court case filed by the National Propane Gas Association in the U.S. Pretensions over the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's approval of a linefill proposal by the MAPCO; Significance of the legal action to the energy industry.

  • Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. v. California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of Complaint. Bose, Kimberly D. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;8/1/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 148, p45596 

    The article presents a notice of complaint filed by Shell Energy North America LP against California Independent System Operator Corp. alleging unjust business practices issued by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

  • Combined Notice of Filings #1. Davis Sr., Nathaniel J. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;9/14/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 179, p56830 

    The article lists the electric rate filings received by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission which was filed by several applicants including Duquesne Light Co., Southwest Power Pool Inc. and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator Inc.

  • Combined Notice of Filings #1. Davis Sr., Nathaniel J. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;9/14/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 179, p56831 

    The article lists the electric rate and securities and exemptwholesale generator filings received by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission which was filed by several applicants including Limon Wind LLC, Wisconsin Power and Light Co. and MDU Resources Group Inc.

  • A Twenty-First Century Lazarus? The Demise and Possible Rebirth of FERC Backstop Siting Authority. Sagar, Santosh // Ecology Law Quarterly;2010, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p693 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Fourth Circuit had struck down a rule issued by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in interpreting section 1221 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). FERC has been authorized to approve the proposed siting of transmission...

  • Late Intervention in FERC Proceedings: How Late Can a Party Be. . . to the Party? Black, Kristi // Ecology Law Quarterly;2010, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p727 

    The article presents a court case wherein California Trout, the petitioners, filed a late motion to intervene in the Pyramid Dam proceeding held by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The CalTrout filed a motion to intervene since the dam's operations will harm the already...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics