TITLE

Biomechanical effect of graded minimal-invasive decompression procedures on lumbar spinal stability

AUTHOR(S)
Hartmann, Frank; Janssen, Claudia; Böhm, Susanne; Hely, Hans; Rommens, Pol; Gercek, Erol
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Sep2012, Vol. 132 Issue 9, p1233
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Decompression surgery represents the standard operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis, but this procedure is often combined with fusion surgery. It is still discussed whether minimal-invasive decompression procedures are sufficient and if they compromise spinal stability as well. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of different minimal-invasive decompression procedures on the range of motion (ROM) of the decompressed and adjacent segments under preload conditions. Methods: Fourteen fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 N m in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload. The ROM of the decompressed segment L3/4 and the adjacent segments L2/L3 and L4/L5 was measured intact and after creating a gradual defect with resection of the interspinous ligament (ISL), bilateral undercutting decompression, detachment of the supraspinous ligament (SSL) and bilateral medial facetectomy. Results: The resection of the ISL had no significant effect on the ROM of all segments. Undercutting decompression showed a significant increase in the ROM of all segments during flexion/extension and lateral bending. The detachment of the SSL caused a significant increase of ROM during flexion/extension in the instrumented and adjacent segments. After bilateral medial facetectomy, a decrease of ROM was observed in all directions of motion except flexion/extension with preload. Conclusions: The results support minimal-invasive procedures for the preservation of spinal stability. Therefore, surgeons can determine which grade of decompression procedure can be performed in the individual patient without requiring additional fusion to maintain spinal stability.
ACCESSION #
79122954

 

Related Articles

  • Examination Findings and Self-Reported Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Iversen, Maura D.; Katz, Jeffrey N. // Physical Therapy;Jul2001, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p1296 

    Deals with a study which described the complaints and physical examination findings on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Clinical symptoms of LSS; Characteristics of pain and pain behavior; Severity and frequency of muscle weakness in LSS; Results and discussion; Conclusion.

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Hall, Stephen; Bartleson, John D.; Onofrio, Burton M.; Baker, Hillier L.; Okazaki, Haruo; O'Duffy, J. Desmond // Annals of Internal Medicine;Aug85, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p271 

    Presents several cases of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnosis on the patients; Symptoms of the disease; Treatment administered on the patients; Discussion on the results of the treatment.

  • Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.  // Advances in Orthopaedics;Dec2010, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p170 

    In this article the author discusses the four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) which examines the better treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis whether surgical or nonoperative management. The study shows that surgical treatment was advantageous in such patients...

  • Spinaplasty following lumbar laminectomy for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis to prevent iatrogenic instability. Tuli, Surendra Mohan; Kapoor, Varun; Jain, Anil K.; Jain, Saurabh // Indian Journal of Orthopaedics;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p396 

    Background: Iatrogenic instability following laminectomy occurs in patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Long segment fusions to obviate postoperative instability result in loss of motion of lumbar spine and predisposes to adjacent level degeneration. The best alternative would be an...

  • What's best for your patient with lumbar spinal stenosis? Standaert, Christopher J.; Herring, Stanley A. // Patient Care for the Nurse Practitioner;Nov2006, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p5 

    The article offers advice on caring for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Care of the patient with low back problems depends on understanding the pathophysiologic and psychosocial issues affecting that individual. The cause of spinal stenosis (SS) include degeneration with disk bulging and...

  • Chiropractic Approach to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Part II: Surgery and Treatments.  // Journal of the American Chiropractic Association;May/Jun2008, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p2 

    The article discusses various treatments to patients having lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). It also discusses the symptoms and diagnostic criteria, testing as well as patients having benefited from chiropractic conservative care for stenosis. According to physician Matthew Kowalski, lumbar...

  • Kinematic response of lumbar functional spinal units to axial torsion with and without superimposed compression and flexion/extension. Haberl, Hannes; Cripton, Peter; Orr, Tracy-E.; Beutler, Thomas; Frei, Hanspeter; Lanksch, Wolfgang; Nolte, L.-P. // European Spine Journal;Oct2004, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p560 

    Experimental data suggest that lumbar torsion contributes to lumbar disc degenerative changes, such as instability, spondylolisthesis and spinal canal stenosis. However, some basic mechanical characteristics of the lumbar spine under torsional loading have not yet been reported in detail. For...

  • Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Morishita, Yuichiro; Ohta, Hideki; Naito, Masatoshi; Matsumoto, Yoshiyuki; Huang, George; Tatsumi, Masato; Takemitsu, Yoshiharu; Kida, Hirotaka // European Spine Journal;Sep2011, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p1480 

    The aim of the current study was to evaluate changes in lumbar kinematics after lumbar monosegmental instrumented surgery with rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. A total of 77 lumbar spinal stenosis patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent L4-5 monosegmental...

  • Indirect decompression for spinal stenosis similar to decompressive laminectomy. Brockenbrough, Gina // Orthopaedics Today/International Edition;Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p18 

    The article discusses research being done on reports on the use of indirect compression devices in patients with lumbar spinal claudication. It references a study Björn Strömqvist et al, presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society in October 2007 in Austin,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics