Biomechanical effect of graded minimal-invasive decompression procedures on lumbar spinal stability

Hartmann, Frank; Janssen, Claudia; Böhm, Susanne; Hely, Hans; Rommens, Pol; Gercek, Erol
September 2012
Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Sep2012, Vol. 132 Issue 9, p1233
Academic Journal
Introduction: Decompression surgery represents the standard operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis, but this procedure is often combined with fusion surgery. It is still discussed whether minimal-invasive decompression procedures are sufficient and if they compromise spinal stability as well. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of different minimal-invasive decompression procedures on the range of motion (ROM) of the decompressed and adjacent segments under preload conditions. Methods: Fourteen fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 N m in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload. The ROM of the decompressed segment L3/4 and the adjacent segments L2/L3 and L4/L5 was measured intact and after creating a gradual defect with resection of the interspinous ligament (ISL), bilateral undercutting decompression, detachment of the supraspinous ligament (SSL) and bilateral medial facetectomy. Results: The resection of the ISL had no significant effect on the ROM of all segments. Undercutting decompression showed a significant increase in the ROM of all segments during flexion/extension and lateral bending. The detachment of the SSL caused a significant increase of ROM during flexion/extension in the instrumented and adjacent segments. After bilateral medial facetectomy, a decrease of ROM was observed in all directions of motion except flexion/extension with preload. Conclusions: The results support minimal-invasive procedures for the preservation of spinal stability. Therefore, surgeons can determine which grade of decompression procedure can be performed in the individual patient without requiring additional fusion to maintain spinal stability.


Related Articles

  • Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome -- an experimental study in porcine model. Ching-Lung Tai; Pang-Hsing Hsieh; Weng-Pin Chen; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2008, Vol. 9, Special section p1 

    Background: The association of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and laminotomy has been clinically studied, but the corresponding in vitro biomechanical studies have not been reported. We investigated the hypothesis that the integrity of the posterior complex (spinous...

  • Estabilización dinámica interespinosa versus fijación transpedicular y artrodesis en el tratamiento del conducto lumbar estrecho en pacientes de 45 a 65 años de edad. Alpízar-Aguirre, A.; Guevara-Álvarez, A.; Rosales-Olivares, L. M.; Zárate-Kalfópulos, B.; Sánchez-Bringas, G.; Reyes-Sánchez, A. // Acta Ortopedica Mexicana;Nov/Dec2012, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p347 

    Introduction: Ligamentoplasty is a posterior dynamic stabilization method. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing decompression and ligamentoplasty versus patients with standard 360° arthrodesis. Material and methods: Two...

  • Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Two-year follow-up in 54 patients. Palmer, Sylvain; Davison, Lisa // Surgical Neurology International;2012, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p231 

    Objective: Minimally invasive surgery has seen increasing application in the treatment of spinal disorders. Treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis, with or without spondylolisthesis, with minimally invasive technique preserves stabilizing ligaments, bone, and muscle. Satisfactory results can...

  • The development of the vertebral canal and associated neurophysiological abnormalities. Porter, R.W. // Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh;Aug98, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p219 

    Features the assessment of the relationship between the spinal contents and the vertebral canal container in Edinburgh, Scotland. Examination of the anatomy of the lumbar vertebral canal and its normal variations; Relationship of size of the canal to neurological back-pain syndromes; Analysis...

  • Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions. Hartmann, Frank; Dietz, Sven-Oliver; Hely, Hans; Rommens, Pol Maria; Gercek, Erol // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Jul2011, Vol. 131 Issue 7, p917 

    Introduction: Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow...

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis. Critchley, E.M.R. // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/29/1982, Vol. 284 Issue 6329, p1588 

    Examines the etiology of lumbar spinal stenosis. Cause of chronic debility; Treatment and management of the disease; Signs and symptoms of the disease.

  • Examination Findings and Self-Reported Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Iversen, Maura D.; Katz, Jeffrey N. // Physical Therapy;Jul2001, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p1296 

    Deals with a study which described the complaints and physical examination findings on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Clinical symptoms of LSS; Characteristics of pain and pain behavior; Severity and frequency of muscle weakness in LSS; Results and discussion; Conclusion.

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Hall, Stephen; Bartleson, John D.; Onofrio, Burton M.; Baker, Hillier L.; Okazaki, Haruo; O'Duffy, J. Desmond // Annals of Internal Medicine;Aug85, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p271 

    Presents several cases of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnosis on the patients; Symptoms of the disease; Treatment administered on the patients; Discussion on the results of the treatment.

  • Aperius® interspinous spacer vs open surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Menchetti, P.; Postachini, F. // Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technology;2009, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p2 

    An abstract of the article "Aperius® Interspinous Spacer vs Open Surgery in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis," by P. Menchetti and F. Postachini is presented.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics