TITLE

Subcontracting alert: New penalties on horizon

PUB. DATE
June 1998
SOURCE
FoodService Director;06/15/98, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that foodservice contractors doing business with federal government agencies could face heavy new penalties for failing to give preferential treatment to subcontractors owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals under a new law in the United States.
ACCESSION #
789441

 

Related Articles

  • Technology Transfer: Agencies' Rights to Federally Sponsored Biomedical Inventions: GAO-03-536.  // GAO Reports;7/1/2003, p1 

    The Bayh-Dole Act gives federal contractors, grantees, and cooperative agreement funding recipients the option to retain ownership rights to inventions they create as part of a federally sponsored research project and profit from commercializing them. The act also protects the government's...

  • In a Bind. Brodsky, Robert // Government Executive;Apr2009, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p18 

    The article focuses on the executive order approved by U.S. President Barack Obama that requires service providers that win follow-on government contracts to recruit non-managerial employees at the previous company. According to the order federal contractors cannot advertise for a position until...

  • Contract bidders may back-track under bill. KITCHENMAN, ANDREW // njbiz;12/13/2010, Vol. 23 Issue 49, p1 

    The article reports on the passage of a legislation in the U.S. in November 2010 that would allow contractors to withdraw erroneous bids. Businesses are given five days after the bid deadline to ask for a withdrawal and the final decision of whether to allow a contractor to withdraw the bid will...

  • Bill Regarding Contract Consolidation Requirements Introduced in Senate. Dees, C. Stanley // Contract Management;May2003, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p64 

    Reports on the introduction of the bill entitled 'Small Business Contractor Safeguard Act' by Senator John Kerry in the U.S. Senate. Sections that will be amended upon enactment of the bill; Additional rules included in the bill that govern small businesses and government contracting.

  • Under Construction. Carr, Matthew // Business Credit;Apr2009, Vol. 111 Issue 4, p6 

    The article discusses the implication of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which took effect on December 12, 2008, for federal contractors in the U.S. It notes that the legislation has brought several changes in contract disclosures, particularly in terms of overpayment claims. Chris Isleib...

  • Eased Rules on Tap for Federal Contractors. Appleson, Gail // American Bar Association Journal;Mar1982, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p261 

    Reports on U.S. Department of Labor solicitor T. Timothy Ryan's prediction that contractors doing business with the U.S. government can expect less burdensome employment discrimination rules by summer 1982. Speech delivered at the 1982 midyear meeting of the American Bar Association (ABA); Goal...

  • Total Costs Claimed. Witte, Robert D. // Contract Management;May2003, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p52 

    Presents a case commentary regarding the contract of Propellex Corp. with the U.S. Army Munitions and Chemical Command. Terms of the contract; Aggregate price of the contract in million-dollars; Investigation of excessive moisture in samples provided by the company; Lawsuit filed by Propellex...

  • Contractors and Federal Spending Accountability Act of 2007 Introduced in House.  // Contract Management;Sep2007, Vol. 47 Issue 9, p64 

    The article reports on the Contractors and Federal Spending Accountability Act of 2007 introduced in the U.S. House on July 12, 2007. This act primarily aims to improve oversight of federal procurement contracts, particularly the suspension and debarment system. It also directs the creation of a...

  • Differing Site Condition Claims: What Is Below the Surface of Exculpatory Clauses or Other Disclaimers? WALKER, OWEN S. // Procurement Lawyer;Summer2013, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p24 

    The article examines the purpose of Differing Site Conditions clause in government procurement in the U.S. It states that subsurface data should be reviewed prior to submitting a bid to protect the rights of contractors in pursuing Type I differing site condition claims. It also discusses the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics