TITLE

Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV)

AUTHOR(S)
Myong, Jun-Pyo; Shin, Jin-yong; Kim, Su-jin
PUB. DATE
August 2012
SOURCE
International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Aug2012, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p1061
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Despite the Government's National Cancer Screening Program for colorectal cancer (CRC), the number of individuals participating in screening in Korea is low. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify associations between relevant risk factors and the uptake of screening in Korea. Methods: The Health Interview Survey sub-dataset derived from the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV) was used to evaluate participation in CRC screening and factors associated with attendance in individuals aged ≥50. Those that completed the questionnaire and not previously diagnosed with CRC were enrolled (8,042 subjects). Multi-dimensional covariates were considered as potential predictors for CRC screening in multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 33.2% complied with the CRC screening recommendations. The following were associated with participation: age (aged 70 or older [ref], aged 70 or over; odds ratio (OR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.14), marital status (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.23-1.66), urban-dwelling (OR 1.16, 95%CI 1.02-1.32), education level (elementary school or less [ref], high school (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.09-1.53), university or higher (OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.23-1.91)), household income (fourth quartile [ref], first quartile (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.07-1.56)), private health insurance (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.21-1.58), smoking (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.43-1.60), self-reported depression (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.68-0.92), and number of chronic diseases (0-3 [ref], ≥4 (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.22-1.62)). Conclusion: To improve participation in CRC screening, appropriate strategies must be directed toward vulnerable populations, such as those with low socioeconomic status.
ACCESSION #
77959280

 

Related Articles

  • Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Mahoney, Martin // American Family Physician;6/1/2000, Vol. 61 Issue 11, p3477 

    Presents case studies on screening for colorectal cancer. Purpose of various screening tests for colorectal cancer; Background on digital rectal examination; Risk factors for colon cancer.

  • New DNA Test Offers Clues to Colon Cancer.  // Prevention;Jan2002, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p125 

    Reports on the development of a DNA stool test that could replace other approaches to colorectal cancer screening.

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening: Sifting Through the Evidence. Levin, Bernard // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;03/03/99, Vol. 91 Issue 5, p399 

    Editorial. Focuses on colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Account of related studies; Importance of such screening; Examples of screening methods.

  • Colorectal cancer screening rates lagging. Kondro, Wayne // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;7/12/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 10, pE647 

    The article reports on the decline of the colorectal cancer screening rates in Canada.

  • Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation. Garcĺa, Antonio Z. Gimeno // Gastroenterology Research & Practice;2012, p1 

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem worldwide. Although population-based CRC screening is strongly recommended in average-risk population, compliance rates are still far from the desirable rates. High levels of screening uptake are necessary for the success of any screening...

  • Recommendations Raise Workload Issues for Colon Cancer Screening. Twombly, Renee // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;3/3/2004, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p348 

    Examines why few countries have adopted colon cancer screening programs. Various tests for colon cancer screening in the United States; Burden that extensive colon cancer screening places on colonoscopy services; Great Britain's launch of a mass colorectal screening program; Lack of colorectal...

  • Backwards boxers and more: Five ways to make colonoscopies easier.  // New York Amsterdam News;5/5/2011, Vol. 102 Issue 18, p26 

    The article encourages women aged 50 and above or those with histories of colon cancer to be screened through mammography, in reflection of the celebration of the National Women's Health Month.

  • Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Glass Is Half Full. Neugut, Alfred I.; Lebwohl, Benjamin // American Journal of Public Health;Apr2009, Vol. 99 Issue 4, p582 

    The authors express their opinion regarding reports indicating that almost half of adults over 50 years old in the U.S. have been screened for colorectal cancer. They note the public health benefits of the increase in screening, explaining that death rates due to colorectal cancer have declined....

  • One appears better than two in CRC screening.  // PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News;5/12/2012, Issue 653, p9 

    The article discusses research on the cost effectiveness of one compared with two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening, referencing a study by S. L. Goede and colleagues published on the April 5, 2012 issue of "Gut."

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics